COWG vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
COWG and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - USD - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both COWG and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COWG or XLG.
Key characteristics
| COWG | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.82% | 23.53% |
| 1Y Return | 27.80% | 32.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.62 | 2.17 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.41% | 14.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.11% | -53.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.18% | -3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWG and XLG is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
COWG vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, COWG achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 23.53% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWG vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COWG vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COWG vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than XLG's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.59% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
COWG vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWG drawdown since its inception was -11.11%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -53.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWG and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COWG vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.81%. This indicates that COWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.