COTG vs. XDSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ).
COTG and XDSQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COTG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 18, 2025. XDSQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
COTG vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COTG vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 29.11% | -21.71% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | -4.89% | 4.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 29.11% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's -4.89% return.
COTG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 29.11%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 13.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COTG vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
XDSQ
COTG vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COTG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.60 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and XDSQ is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
COTG vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither COTG nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
COTG vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, smaller than the maximum XDSQ drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and XDSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -26.06% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | -7.12% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -5.08% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.64% | 17.99% | +20.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.64% | 15.32% | +23.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.64% | 15.32% | +23.32% |