COTG vs. QTJL
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
COTG vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.15% return.
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.15% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and QTJL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
QTJL
COTG vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COTG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 0.52 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
COTG vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum QTJL drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.69% | -33.40% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.48% | -0.01% | -23.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.35% | -7.94% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.65% | 10.01% | +30.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.65% | 20.42% | +20.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.65% | 20.42% | +20.23% |
COTG vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
COTG vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither COTG nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and QTJL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.
COTG and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for COTG and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer