PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTG vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


COTG

1D
1.52%
1M
-14.19%
YTD
15.84%
6M
17.42%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COTG and LINT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COTG vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COTG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTGLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-49.54%

+23.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.45%

-12.86%

-11.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-20.48%

+10.76%

Volatility

COTG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTGLINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.02%

168.83%

-128.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.02%

168.83%

-128.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.02%

168.83%

-128.81%

COTG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

COTG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COTG and LINT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTG and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer