COTG vs. EMPB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and EMPB (Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while EMPB is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Empowered Funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for EMPB.

Performance

COTG vs. EMPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 20.04% return, which is significantly higher than EMPB's 13.44% return.

COTG

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 6M: 10.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMPB

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 5.35%
• YTD: 13.44%
• 6M: 11.86%
• 1Y: 19.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. EMPB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	20.04%	-21.71%
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	13.44%	-1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between COTG and EMPB is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

COTG vs. EMPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPB

EMPB Risk / Return Rank: 57
EMPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
EMPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
EMPB Omega Ratio Rank: 54
EMPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EMPB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTG vs. EMPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF (EMPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COTG	EMPB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.21	1.75	-1.95

Drawdowns

COTG vs. EMPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, which is greater than EMPB's maximum drawdown of -7.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and EMPB.

Drawdown Indicators

	COTG	EMPB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.69%	-7.55%	-18.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.71%	-0.18%	-21.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-1.50%	-6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COTG	EMPB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.63%	11.38%	+29.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.63%	11.80%	+28.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.63%	11.80%	+28.83%

COTG vs. EMPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EMPB's 1.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

COTG vs. EMPB - Dividend Comparison

COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMPB Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF	0.77%	0.88%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COTG and EMPB in my portfolio?

COTG and EMPB have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COTG or EMPB?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COTG or EMPB?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.82% for EMPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COTG or EMPB?

EMPB has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

What is the main difference between COTG and EMPB?

COTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EMPB is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Empowered Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 1.82% for EMPB.