COTG vs. BNKU
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU).
COTG and BNKU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COTG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 18, 2025. BNKU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 2, 2019.
Performance
COTG vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COTG vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 29.14% | -21.71% |
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | -19.59% | 18.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 29.14% return, which is significantly higher than BNKU's -19.59% return.
COTG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 29.14%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNKU
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -19.59%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- 1Y
- 71.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COTG vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
BNKU
COTG vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COTG | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.21 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and BNKU is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
COTG vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison
Neither COTG nor BNKU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
COTG vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, smaller than the maximum BNKU drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and BNKU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -58.03% | +34.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -41.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.87% | -31.84% | +25.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.58% | -16.05% | +7.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.59% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.49% | 73.75% | -35.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.49% | 75.64% | -37.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.49% | 75.64% | -37.15% |