COST vs. ATD.TO
COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) and ATD.TO (Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.) are both stocks. COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while ATD.TO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, COST returned 22.27%/yr vs 12.06%/yr for ATD.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COST vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COST is traded in USD, while ATD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than ATD.TO's 10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 22.27%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.06% annualized return.
COST
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.27%
ATD.TO
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 13.03%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
COST vs. ATD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 14.24% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 10.42% | -0.37% | -4.94% | 35.48% | 6.47% | 22.90% | 8.45% | 28.38% | -3.87% | 14.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST and ATD.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.19 |
The correlation between COST and ATD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
COST:
$26.51
ATD.TO:
$2.90
COST:
37.06
ATD.TO:
20.80
COST:
2.90
ATD.TO:
6.44
COST:
1.12
ATD.TO:
0.77
COST:
$293.59B
ATD.TO:
$73.29B
COST:
$11.12B
ATD.TO:
$13.89B
COST:
$12.48B
ATD.TO:
$6.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST vs. ATD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
COST
ATD.TO
COST vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COST | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.11 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 0.98 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 1.92 | -2.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COST vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and ATD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.39% | -58.96% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.14% | -13.33% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -26.59% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -26.59% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -38.09% | +6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | -3.61% | -6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -10.39% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 6.83% | -0.16% |
Volatility
COST vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) at 5.92%. This indicates that COST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST | ATD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 5.92% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 18.02% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 25.57% | -6.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 24.26% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 25.02% | -3.07% |
Dividends
COST vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison
COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than ATD.TO's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.97% | 1.07% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.69% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 0.72% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
Financials
COST vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COST vs. ATD.TO - Profitability Comparison
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
ATD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.24B and revenue of 21.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
ATD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
ATD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 757.20M and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COST and ATD.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for COST and ATD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer