COSM vs. HBM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cosmos Health Inc. (COSM) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM).

Performance

COSM vs. HBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cosmos Health Inc. (COSM) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COSM vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COSM Cosmos Health Inc.	-36.31%	-25.56%	-52.55%	-69.08%	-94.59%	-33.92%	131.82%	-45.00%	-60.78%	1,143.90%
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.	5.32%	145.46%	47.03%	9.24%	-29.87%	3.82%	69.50%	-11.77%	-46.20%	54.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap COSM : $9.71M HBM : $8.36B
EPS COSM : -$0.62 HBM : $1.43
PS Ratio COSM : 0.16 HBM : 3.75
PB Ratio COSM : 0.42 HBM : 2.59
Total Revenue (TTM) COSM : $59.79M HBM : $2.22B
Gross Profit (TTM) COSM : $6.82M HBM : $719.02M
EBITDA (TTM) COSM : -$14.92M HBM : $1.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSM achieves a -36.31% return, which is significantly lower than HBM's 5.32% return. Over the past 10 years, COSM has underperformed HBM with an annualized return of -33.88%, while HBM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.51% annualized return.

COSM

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -19.35%
• YTD: -36.31%
• 6M: -71.42%
• 1Y: -27.25%
• 3Y*: -55.25%
• 5Y*: -69.74%
• 10Y*: -33.88%

HBM

• 1D: 9.71%
• 1M: -26.20%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 37.91%
• 1Y: 175.61%
• 3Y*: 58.80%
• 5Y*: 23.76%
• 10Y*: 19.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

COSM vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSM

COSM Risk / Return Rank: 32
COSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
COSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
COSM Omega Ratio Rank: 35
COSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
COSM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

HBM

HBM Risk / Return Rank: 95
HBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HBM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
HBM Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSM vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cosmos Health Inc. (COSM) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COSM	HBM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.27	3.14	-3.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	3.29	-3.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.44	-0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	4.76	-5.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.71	17.20	-17.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COSM vs. HBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSM Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the HBM Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSM and HBM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COSM	HBM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27	3.14	-3.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.44	0.43	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.09	0.33	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.18	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between COSM and HBM is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

COSM vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison

COSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COSM Cosmos Health Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.	0.07%	0.07%	0.17%	0.31%	0.32%	0.22%	0.21%	0.36%	0.38%	0.23%	0.35%	0.52%

Drawdowns

COSM vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSM drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than HBM's maximum drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSM and HBM.

Drawdown Indicators

	COSM	HBM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.90%	-92.21%	-7.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.82%	-36.16%	-38.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.84%	-65.47%	-34.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.90%	-86.34%	-13.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	-26.20%	-73.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.96%	-52.93%	-11.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.57%	10.00%	+31.57%

Volatility

COSM vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cosmos Health Inc. (COSM) is 18.59%, while Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a volatility of 20.96%. This indicates that COSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COSM	HBM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.59%	20.96%	-2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.03%	42.37%	+18.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	100.48%	56.37%	+44.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	158.27%	55.19%	+103.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	373.54%	59.45%	+314.09%

Financials

COSM vs. HBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cosmos Health Inc. and Hudbay Minerals Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

COSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cosmos Health Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.60M and revenue of 17.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.2%.

HBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 245.92M and revenue of 737.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

COSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cosmos Health Inc. reported an operating income of -1.82M and revenue of 17.11M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.6%.

HBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 242.47M and revenue of 737.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.

COSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cosmos Health Inc. reported a net income of -5.35M and revenue of 17.11M, resulting in a net margin of -31.3%.

HBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 129.97M and revenue of 737.06M, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.