CORN vs. TAGS
CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from Teucrium - CORN tracks the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark while TAGS tracks the Teucrium TAGS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CORN returned -0.54%/yr vs -0.46%/yr for TAGS. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CORN charges 2.19%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.
Performance
CORN vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORN achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than TAGS's 7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CORN has underperformed TAGS with an annualized return of -0.54%, while TAGS has yielded a comparatively higher -0.46% annualized return.
CORN
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 2.80%
- 3Y*
- -8.35%
- 5Y*
- -2.59%
- 10Y*
- -0.54%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.16%
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- -7.68%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- -0.46%
- ALL TIME*
- -4.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.63M | $5.32M | $8.06M | |
| $388.58K | $387.70K | $588.98K |
CORN vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | -0.45% | -5.54% | -12.98% | -19.90% | 25.02% | 38.25% | 5.27% | -7.79% | -4.28% | -10.38% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 7.86% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORN and TAGS is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2012 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, CORN and TAGS have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORN vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
CORN
TAGS
CORN vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.46 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 1.16 | -0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORN vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORN drawdown since its inception was -78.09%, roughly equal to the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORN and TAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.09% | -76.40% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.86% | -9.65% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -28.40% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.19% | -37.60% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.19% | -42.51% | -2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.49% | -63.09% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.23% | -57.28% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 3.81% | +0.98% |
Volatility
CORN vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) at 5.52%. This indicates that CORN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 5.52% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 11.27% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 13.27% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 16.16% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 17.98% | +1.29% |
CORN vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORN has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
CORN vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CORN nor TAGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CORN and TAGS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CORN has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to TAGS (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORN dropped -78.09% vs TAGS's -76.40%.
On 10-year performance, TAGS leads with -0.46% vs -0.54% for CORN. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TAGS has performed better with a -0.46% return vs -0.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 2.19% for CORN.
CORN and TAGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CORN tracks Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark, while TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index. Their fees differ too: 2.19% for CORN and 0.21% for TAGS.
TAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CORN and TAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer