CORN vs. TAGS
CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from Teucrium - CORN tracks the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark while TAGS tracks the Teucrium TAGS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CORN returned -2.61%/yr vs -1.74%/yr for TAGS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CORN charges 2.19%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.
Performance
CORN vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORN achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than TAGS's 6.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CORN has underperformed TAGS with an annualized return of -2.61%, while TAGS has yielded a comparatively higher -1.74% annualized return.
CORN
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -1.91%
- 1Y
- -4.06%
- 3Y*
- -9.83%
- 5Y*
- -3.99%
- 10Y*
- -2.61%
TAGS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- -7.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- -1.74%
CORN vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | -1.47% | -5.54% | -12.98% | -19.90% | 25.02% | 38.25% | 5.27% | -7.79% | -4.28% | -10.38% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 6.11% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORN and TAGS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, CORN and TAGS have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORN vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
CORN
TAGS
CORN vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CORN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.00 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.09 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | -0.16 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CORN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | -0.08 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | -0.09 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | -0.10 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | -0.23 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
CORN vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORN drawdown since its inception was -78.09%, roughly equal to the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORN and TAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.09% | -76.40% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | -10.07% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.57% | -33.59% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.39% | -37.60% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.10% | -47.30% | -3.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.83% | -63.69% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.08% | -57.23% | +6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 5.88% | -0.70% |
Volatility
CORN vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) at 5.52%. This indicates that CORN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORN | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 5.52% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 10.12% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 12.61% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 16.58% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 18.04% | +1.36% |
CORN vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORN has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
CORN vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CORN nor TAGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CORN and TAGS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CORN has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to TAGS (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORN dropped -78.09% vs TAGS's -76.40%.
On 10-year performance, TAGS leads with -1.74% vs -2.61% for CORN. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TAGS has performed better with a -1.74% return vs -2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 2.19% for CORN.
CORN and TAGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CORN tracks Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark, while TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index. Their fees differ too: 2.19% for CORN and 0.21% for TAGS.
TAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CORN and TAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer