PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CORN vs. TAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CORN vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CORN vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CORN
Teucrium Corn Fund
3.78%-5.54%-12.98%-19.90%25.02%38.25%5.27%-7.79%-4.28%-10.38%
TAGS
Teucrium Agricultural Fund
10.65%-8.76%-14.57%-6.11%16.25%27.05%8.19%-4.53%-7.10%-13.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORN achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than TAGS's 10.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CORN has underperformed TAGS with an annualized return of -0.95%, while TAGS has yielded a comparatively higher -0.44% annualized return.


CORN

1D
0.60%
1M
2.85%
YTD
3.78%
6M
5.44%
1Y
-0.86%
3Y*
-9.99%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
-0.95%

TAGS

1D
0.96%
1M
6.22%
YTD
10.65%
6M
8.56%
1Y
0.50%
3Y*
-6.51%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
-0.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CORN vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORN has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CORN vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CORN
CORN Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CORN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CORN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CORN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CORN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CORN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

TAGS
TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CORN vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CORNTAGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.06

0.04

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

0.15

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.02

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

0.04

-0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.04

0.07

-0.10

CORN vs. TAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CORN Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the TAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORN and TAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CORNTAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

0.04

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.16

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

-0.02

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.22

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between CORN and TAGS is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CORN vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CORN nor TAGS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CORN vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORN drawdown since its inception was -78.09%, roughly equal to the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORN and TAGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CORNTAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.09%

-76.40%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.66%

-12.12%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.39%

-37.60%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-47.30%

-3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.07%

-62.14%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.93%

-57.15%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.11%

7.59%

+1.52%

Volatility

CORN vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) at 4.78%. This indicates that CORN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CORNTAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

4.78%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

8.49%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

11.47%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

16.91%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

18.34%

+1.17%