CORN vs. CANE
CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) and CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from Teucrium - CORN tracks the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark while CANE tracks the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CORN returned -0.54%/yr vs -2.68%/yr for CANE. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CORN charges 2.19%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for CANE.
Performance
CORN vs. CANE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORN achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than CANE's -1.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CORN has outperformed CANE with an annualized return of -0.54%, while CANE has yielded a comparatively lower -2.68% annualized return.
CORN
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 2.80%
- 3Y*
- -8.35%
- 5Y*
- -2.59%
- 10Y*
- -0.54%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.16%
CANE
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- -11.17%
- 3Y*
- -10.64%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- -2.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.32M | $1.65M | $3.43M | |
| $5.63M | $5.32M | $8.06M |
CORN vs. CANE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund | -0.45% | -5.54% | -12.98% | -19.90% | 25.02% | 38.25% | 5.27% | -7.79% | -4.28% | -10.38% |
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | -1.38% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | 3.59% | 36.30% | -3.85% | -0.97% | -27.52% | -24.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORN and CANE is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORN vs. CANE — Risk / Return Rank
CORN
CANE
CORN vs. CANE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORN | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.92 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.60 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | -0.89 | +1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORN vs. CANE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORN drawdown since its inception was -78.09%, roughly equal to the maximum CANE drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORN and CANE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORN | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.09% | -81.30% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.86% | -19.82% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -41.73% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.19% | -41.73% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.19% | -67.29% | +22.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.49% | -63.44% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.23% | -56.56% | +5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 13.33% | -8.54% |
Volatility
CORN vs. CANE - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) at 5.03%. This indicates that CORN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORN | CANE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 5.03% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 16.18% | -3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 20.20% | -4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 20.92% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 21.58% | -2.31% |
CORN vs. CANE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORN has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than CANE's 1.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
CORN vs. CANE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CORN nor CANE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CORN and CANE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CORN has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to CANE (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORN dropped -78.09% vs CANE's -81.30%.
On 10-year performance, CORN leads with -0.54% vs -2.68% for CANE. On fees, CANE is cheaper at 1.88% per year. On volatility, CANE has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CORN has performed better with a -0.54% return vs -2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CANE is cheaper with a 1.88% expense ratio, compared with 2.19% for CORN.
CORN and CANE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CORN tracks Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark, while CANE tracks Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark. Their fees differ too: 2.19% for CORN and 1.88% for CANE.
CORN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CORN and CANE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer