PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CORD vs. PLTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CORD vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORD achieves a -87.59% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 4.28% return.


CORD

1D
14.09%
1M
3.13%
YTD
-87.59%
6M
-88.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTZ

1D
13.03%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
4.28%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORD vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CORD and PLTZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CORD vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CORD vs. PLTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CORDPLTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

-0.62

+0.13

Drawdowns

CORD vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORD drawdown since its inception was -93.69%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORD and PLTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CORDPLTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.69%

-70.28%

-23.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.90%

-62.87%

-29.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.33%

-52.02%

-4.31%

Volatility

CORD vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CORDPLTZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.84%

101.99%

+85.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.84%

101.99%

+85.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.84%

101.99%

+85.85%

CORD vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CORD vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither CORD nor PLTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CORD and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CORD.

CORD and PLTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CORD and 1.29% for PLTZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CORD and PLTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer