PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CORD vs. SBTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CORD vs. SBTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORD achieves a -87.55% return, which is significantly lower than SBTU's -78.65% return.


CORD

1D
10.23%
1M
-17.14%
YTD
-87.55%
6M
-84.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBTU

1D
-12.70%
1M
-39.34%
YTD
-78.65%
6M
-80.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORD vs. SBTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CORD
T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF
-87.55%81.40%
SBTU
T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF
-78.65%-67.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CORD and SBTU is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025

-0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CORD vs. SBTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CORD vs. SBTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CORD vs. SBTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORD drawdown since its inception was -93.69%, roughly equal to the maximum SBTU drawdown of -93.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORD and SBTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CORDSBTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.69%

-93.04%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.88%

-93.04%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.48%

-69.92%

+11.44%

Volatility

CORD vs. SBTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CORDSBTUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.33%

160.40%

+24.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

185.33%

160.40%

+24.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

185.33%

160.40%

+24.93%

CORD vs. SBTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CORD and SBTU have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

CORD vs. SBTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CORD nor SBTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CORD and SBTU have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CORD and SBTU have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

CORD and SBTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CORD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SBTU is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CORD and SBTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer