PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CORD vs. BITK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CORD vs. BITK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORD achieves a -87.55% return, which is significantly lower than BITK's -32.04% return.


CORD

1D
10.23%
1M
-17.14%
YTD
-87.55%
6M
-84.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITK

1D
-3.11%
1M
-18.15%
YTD
-32.04%
6M
-32.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORD vs. BITK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CORD and BITK is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CORD vs. BITK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CORD vs. BITK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CORD vs. BITK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORD drawdown since its inception was -93.69%, which is greater than BITK's maximum drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORD and BITK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CORDBITKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.69%

-56.28%

-37.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.88%

-54.86%

-37.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.48%

-36.01%

-22.47%

Volatility

CORD vs. BITK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CORDBITKDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.33%

49.31%

+136.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

185.33%

49.31%

+136.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

185.33%

49.31%

+136.02%

CORD vs. BITK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BITK's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CORD vs. BITK - Dividend Comparison

CORD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.83%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CORD and BITK have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BITK is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BITK is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CORD.

BITK has the higher dividend yield at 48.83%, compared with 0.00% for CORD.

CORD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BITK is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CORD and 0.99% for BITK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CORD and BITK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer