COR vs. HLAL

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

COR (Cencora Inc.) is a stock, while HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Over the past 5 years, COR returned 21.82%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for HLAL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

COR vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cencora Inc. (COR) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COR achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 12.62% return.

COR

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: -14.70%
• 6M: -15.26%
• 1Y: -1.10%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 21.82%
• 10Y*: 17.95%

HLAL

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -3.22%
• YTD: 12.62%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 32.96%
• 3Y*: 19.46%
• 5Y*: 14.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COR vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
COR Cencora Inc.	-14.70%	51.48%	10.37%	25.33%	26.26%	44.09%	23.37%	-1.72%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	12.62%	18.30%	16.70%	30.13%	-17.56%	28.64%	24.65%	10.61%

Correlation

The correlation between COR and HLAL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019	0.26

The correlation between COR and HLAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COR vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COR

COR Risk / Return Rank: 40
COR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
COR Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
COR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
COR Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
COR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 80
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 80
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COR vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cencora Inc. (COR) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COR	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	2.30	-2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	3.14	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.41	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	3.25	-3.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	13.71	-13.80

COR vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COR Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COR and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COR vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COR drawdown since its inception was -71.01%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COR and HLAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	COR	HLAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.01%	-33.57%	-37.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.44%	-10.20%	-22.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.44%	-21.67%	-10.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.44%	-23.18%	-9.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.12%	-5.21%	-17.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.64%	-4.99%	-8.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.51%	2.41%	+10.10%

Volatility

COR vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

Cencora Inc. (COR) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) have volatilities of 6.38% and 6.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COR	HLAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	6.50%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.15%	11.63%	+15.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.35%	14.40%	+15.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.34%	17.80%	+4.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.51%	20.26%	+7.25%

Dividends

COR vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

COR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than HLAL's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COR Cencora Inc.	0.82%	0.67%	0.93%	0.96%	1.13%	5.13%	6.74%	7.48%	2.07%	1.61%	1.77%	1.17%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.46%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COR and HLAL in my portfolio?

COR and HLAL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COR or HLAL?

HLAL has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to COR (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COR dropped -71.01% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.