COPP vs. METL
COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPP is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index, while METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott. COPP is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. COPP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
COPP vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPP achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than METL's -5.03% return.
COPP
- 1D
- -3.39%
- 1M
- -16.85%
- 6M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- -17.23%
- 6M
- -18.45%
- YTD
- -5.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPP vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 4.80% | 41.21% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | -5.03% | 28.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPP and METL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPP vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
COPP
METL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COPP vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPP | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPP vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPP drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPP | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.37% | -27.99% | -16.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.18% | -27.99% | +7.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.01% | -9.82% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.68% | — | — |
Volatility
COPP vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPP | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.64% | 44.35% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.67% | 44.35% | -2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.67% | 44.35% | -2.68% |
COPP vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPP vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than METL's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 2.26% | 2.37% | 2.59% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 1.05% | 0.99% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPP and METL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COPP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
COPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.05% for METL.
COPP is categorized as Copper, while METL is Natural Resources. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPP and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for COPP and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer