PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COP vs. VALE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COP vs. VALE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Vale S.A. (VALE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a 26.87% return, which is significantly higher than VALE's 20.57% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has underperformed VALE with an annualized return of 13.66%, while VALE has yielded a comparatively higher 22.05% annualized return.


COP

1D
1.40%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
26.87%
6M
24.31%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
13.66%

VALE

1D
2.28%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
20.57%
6M
23.80%
1Y
73.31%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
22.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COP vs. VALE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
26.87%-2.34%-12.02%1.98%71.69%86.60%-36.04%6.63%15.63%11.95%
VALE
Vale S.A.
20.57%60.70%-38.83%1.57%32.54%-1.45%32.40%2.72%12.25%68.03%

Correlation

The correlation between COP and VALE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2002

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between COP and VALE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COP:

$143.30B

VALE:

$67.15B

EPS

COP:

$5.90

VALE:

$0.65

PE Ratio

COP:

19.83

VALE:

24.04

PS Ratio

COP:

2.49

VALE:

1.70

PB Ratio

COP:

2.22

VALE:

1.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

COP:

$58.31B

VALE:

$39.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COP:

$17.02B

VALE:

$13.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

COP:

$22.44B

VALE:

$14.33B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COP vs. VALE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COP
COP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VALE
VALE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VALE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VALE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COP vs. VALE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Vale S.A. (VALE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPVALEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.71

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

12.21

-8.13

COP vs. VALE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COP Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the VALE Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COP and VALE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COP vs. VALE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -84.55%, smaller than the maximum VALE drawdown of -92.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and VALE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPVALEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.55%

-92.78%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.90%

-19.85%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.19%

-41.94%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-49.79%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.66%

-57.60%

-13.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.92%

-11.84%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.49%

-36.69%

+11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

6.02%

+0.78%

Volatility

COP vs. VALE - Volatility Comparison

ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Vale S.A. (VALE) have volatilities of 8.72% and 9.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPVALEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.72%

9.16%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

26.35%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.33%

32.06%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.80%

35.47%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.64%

40.84%

-3.20%

Dividends

COP vs. VALE - Dividend Comparison

COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than VALE's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.82%3.40%3.35%3.37%4.23%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%
VALE
Vale S.A.
3.66%7.29%11.41%7.75%8.63%19.70%2.72%2.63%4.16%3.77%1.06%7.48%

Financials

COP vs. VALE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and Vale S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20.00B22.00B20222023202420252026
16.05B
9.26B
(COP) Total Revenue
(VALE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COP vs. VALE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ConocoPhillips Company and Vale S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
46.7%
33.0%
Portfolio components
COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.

VALE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vale S.A. reported a gross profit of 3.06B and revenue of 9.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

VALE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vale S.A. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 9.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

VALE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vale S.A. reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 9.26B, resulting in a net margin of 20.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COP and VALE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VALE has higher volatility (9.16%) compared to COP (8.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COP dropped -84.55% vs VALE's -92.78%.

VALE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COP and VALE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer