PortfoliosLab logo
VALE vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between VALE and ET is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

VALE vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vale S.A. (VALE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VALE:

-0.64

ET:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

VALE:

-0.83

ET:

1.02

Omega Ratio

VALE:

0.90

ET:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

VALE:

-0.38

ET:

0.70

Martin Ratio

VALE:

-1.04

ET:

2.29

Ulcer Index

VALE:

19.09%

ET:

7.51%

Daily Std Dev

VALE:

29.98%

ET:

27.33%

Max Drawdown

VALE:

-93.21%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

VALE:

-44.84%

ET:

-15.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VALE:

$40.37B

ET:

$59.06B

EPS

VALE:

$1.38

ET:

$1.32

PE Ratio

VALE:

6.78

ET:

13.04

PEG Ratio

VALE:

10.64

ET:

0.76

PS Ratio

VALE:

1.12

ET:

0.72

PB Ratio

VALE:

1.12

ET:

1.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

VALE:

$37.20B

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VALE:

$13.17B

ET:

$14.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

VALE:

$13.49B

ET:

$11.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VALE achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -9.01% return. Over the past 10 years, VALE has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 9.62%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.40% annualized return.


VALE

YTD

9.69%

1M

1.52%

6M

-7.31%

1Y

-18.17%

5Y*

14.00%

10Y*

9.62%

ET

YTD

-9.01%

1M

7.42%

6M

3.04%

1Y

16.23%

5Y*

28.81%

10Y*

1.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VALE vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VALE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VALE is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VALE is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VALE is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VALE is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VALE is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VALE is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VALE vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vale S.A. (VALE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VALE Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VALE and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

VALE vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

VALE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, more than ET's 7.52% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VALE
Vale S.A.
8.88%11.30%7.75%8.65%19.70%2.73%2.63%4.16%3.39%0.64%8.84%6.69%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.52%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

VALE vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VALE drawdown since its inception was -93.21%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VALE and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

VALE vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vale S.A. (VALE) is 7.75%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that VALE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

VALE vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vale S.A. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
8.12B
21.02B
(VALE) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VALE vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vale S.A. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
32.9%
19.4%
(VALE) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
VALE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vale S.A. reported a gross profit of 2.67B and revenue of 8.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

VALE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vale S.A. reported an operating income of 1.80B and revenue of 8.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.50B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

VALE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vale S.A. reported a net income of 1.39B and revenue of 8.12B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.