PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COP vs. AVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COP vs. AVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COP achieves a 26.87% return, which is significantly higher than AVY's -11.44% return. Over the past 10 years, COP has outperformed AVY with an annualized return of 13.66%, while AVY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.


COP

1D
1.40%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
26.87%
6M
24.31%
1Y
24.65%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
13.66%

AVY

1D
0.31%
1M
2.60%
YTD
-11.44%
6M
-11.79%
1Y
-6.75%
3Y*
0.06%
5Y*
-4.53%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COP vs. AVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
26.87%-2.34%-12.02%1.98%71.69%86.60%-36.04%6.63%15.63%11.95%
AVY
Avery Dennison Corporation
-11.44%-0.73%-5.95%13.66%-15.06%41.41%20.86%48.54%-20.28%66.75%

Correlation

The correlation between COP and AVY is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1983

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between COP and AVY has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COP:

$143.30B

AVY:

$12.26B

EPS

COP:

$5.90

AVY:

$8.87

PE Ratio

COP:

19.83

AVY:

17.95

PEG Ratio

COP:

1.15

AVY:

5.99

PS Ratio

COP:

2.49

AVY:

1.37

PB Ratio

COP:

2.22

AVY:

5.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

COP:

$58.31B

AVY:

$9.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COP:

$17.02B

AVY:

$2.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

COP:

$22.44B

AVY:

$1.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COP vs. AVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COP
COP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

AVY
AVY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVY Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVY Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COP vs. AVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ConocoPhillips Company (COP) and Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPAVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.95

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

-0.43

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

-0.91

+4.98

COP vs. AVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COP Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the AVY Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COP and AVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COP vs. AVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COP drawdown since its inception was -84.55%, which is greater than AVY's maximum drawdown of -73.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COP and AVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPAVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.55%

-73.03%

-11.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.90%

-21.62%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.19%

-30.56%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-31.80%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.66%

-43.52%

-27.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.92%

-27.73%

+15.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.49%

-16.79%

-8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.80%

10.16%

-3.36%

Volatility

COP vs. AVY - Volatility Comparison

ConocoPhillips Company (COP) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY) at 7.39%. This indicates that COP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPAVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.72%

7.39%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

16.29%

+6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.33%

23.82%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.80%

24.68%

+8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.64%

27.06%

+10.58%

Dividends

COP vs. AVY - Dividend Comparison

COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than AVY's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVY
Avery Dennison Corporation
2.40%2.03%1.84%1.57%1.62%1.23%1.52%1.73%2.24%1.53%2.28%2.33%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.82%3.40%3.35%3.37%4.23%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%

Financials

COP vs. AVY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ConocoPhillips Company and Avery Dennison Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
16.05B
2.30B
(COP) Total Revenue
(AVY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COP vs. AVY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ConocoPhillips Company and Avery Dennison Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
46.7%
28.9%
Portfolio components
COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.

AVY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avery Dennison Corporation reported a gross profit of 664.80M and revenue of 2.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

AVY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avery Dennison Corporation reported an operating income of 271.90M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

AVY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avery Dennison Corporation reported a net income of 168.10M and revenue of 2.30B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COP and AVY have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COP has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to AVY (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COP dropped -84.55% vs AVY's -73.03%.

COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COP and AVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer