CONI vs. SFYF
CONI (GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF) and SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONI is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index. CONI is actively managed, while SFYF is passively managed. Over the past year, CONI returned -17.01% vs 34.24% for SFYF. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. CONI charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SFYF.
Performance
CONI vs. SFYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONI achieves a -18.05% return, which is significantly lower than SFYF's 8.48% return.
CONI
- 1D
- 7.89%
- 1M
- 22.94%
- YTD
- -18.05%
- 6M
- -6.27%
- 1Y
- -17.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYF
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 34.24%
- 3Y*
- 32.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CONI vs. SFYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF | -18.05% | -70.84% | -53.81% |
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 8.48% | 30.00% | 25.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONI and SFYF is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | -0.66 |
The correlation between CONI and SFYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
CONI vs. SFYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CONI
SFYF
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CONI
SFYF
Basic Materials
CONI
-
SFYF
-
Communication Services
CONI
-
SFYF
Consumer Cyclical
CONI
-
SFYF
Consumer Defensive
CONI
-
SFYF
Energy
CONI
-
SFYF
Healthcare
CONI
-
SFYF
Industrials
CONI
-
SFYF
Real Estate
CONI
-
SFYF
Technology
CONI
-
SFYF
Utilities
CONI
-
SFYF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONI vs. SFYF — Risk / Return Rank
CONI
SFYF
CONI vs. SFYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONI | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.30 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.27 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 7.28 | -7.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONI vs. SFYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONI drawdown since its inception was -94.53%, which is greater than SFYF's maximum drawdown of -56.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONI and SFYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONI | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.53% | -56.09% | -38.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.12% | -15.18% | -59.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.95% | -7.13% | -82.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -16.49% | -57.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.16% | 4.72% | +39.44% |
Volatility
CONI vs. SFYF - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) has a higher volatility of 36.67% compared to SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) at 8.20%. This indicates that CONI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONI | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.67% | 8.20% | +28.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 110.98% | 14.97% | +96.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 136.92% | 19.70% | +117.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 127.41% | 29.37% | +98.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.41% | 30.69% | +96.72% |
CONI vs. SFYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONI has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONI vs. SFYF - Dividend Comparison
CONI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than SFYF's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF | 1.07% | 0.87% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 0.30% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 1.71% | 1.19% | 0.26% | 0.40% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONI and SFYF have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONI has higher volatility (36.67%) compared to SFYF (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONI dropped -94.53% vs SFYF's -56.09%.
On 1-year performance, SFYF leads with 34.24% vs -17.01% for CONI. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SFYF has been the lower-risk option at 8.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 34.24% return vs -17.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONI.
CONI has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.30% for SFYF.
CONI is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SFYF is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONI and 0.29% for SFYF.
SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONI and SFYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer