CONI vs. DECO
CONI (GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF) and DECO (State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONI is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while DECO is a Blockchain fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONI returned 38.50% vs 105.78% for DECO. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. CONI charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DECO.
Performance
CONI vs. DECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONI achieves a -22.77% return, which is significantly lower than DECO's 64.76% return.
CONI
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- -22.77%
- 1Y
- 38.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DECO
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 42.15%
- YTD
- 64.76%
- 1Y
- 105.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONI vs. DECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF | -22.77% | -70.84% | -55.67% |
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 64.76% | 42.48% | 31.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONI and DECO is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | -0.68 |
The correlation between CONI and DECO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.68 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
CONI vs. DECO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CONI
DECO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CONI
DECO
Basic Materials
CONI
-
DECO
Communication Services
CONI
-
DECO
-
Consumer Cyclical
CONI
-
DECO
-
Consumer Defensive
CONI
-
DECO
-
Energy
CONI
-
DECO
-
Healthcare
CONI
-
DECO
-
Industrials
CONI
-
DECO
Real Estate
CONI
-
DECO
-
Technology
CONI
-
DECO
Utilities
CONI
-
DECO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONI vs. DECO — Risk / Return Rank
CONI
DECO
CONI vs. DECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONI | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.36 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 4.16 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | 11.45 | -10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONI vs. DECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONI drawdown since its inception was -94.53%, which is greater than DECO's maximum drawdown of -47.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONI and DECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONI | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.53% | -47.71% | -46.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.12% | -25.60% | -49.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.53% | -9.74% | -80.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.09% | -11.27% | -62.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.32% | 9.27% | +33.05% |
Volatility
CONI vs. DECO - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) has a higher volatility of 35.73% compared to State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) at 10.02%. This indicates that CONI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONI | DECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.73% | 10.02% | +25.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 112.77% | 33.33% | +79.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 135.39% | 44.00% | +91.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 127.41% | 50.90% | +76.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.41% | 50.90% | +76.51% |
CONI vs. DECO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONI has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DECO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONI vs. DECO - Dividend Comparison
CONI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than DECO's 0.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF | 1.13% | 0.87% | 1.39% |
DECO State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF | 0.70% | 1.16% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONI and DECO have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONI has higher volatility (35.73%) compared to DECO (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONI dropped -94.53% vs DECO's -47.71%.
On 1-year performance, DECO leads with 105.78% vs 38.50% for CONI. On fees, DECO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, DECO has been the lower-risk option at 10.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DECO has performed better with a 105.78% return vs 38.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DECO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONI.
CONI has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.70% for DECO.
CONI is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DECO is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONI and 0.65% for DECO.
DECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONI and DECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer