COMT vs. LRGF
COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) and LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index, while LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COMT returned 8.89%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for LRGF. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. COMT charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LRGF.
Performance
COMT vs. LRGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COMT achieves a 33.14% return, which is significantly higher than LRGF's 8.94% return. Over the past 10 years, COMT has underperformed LRGF with an annualized return of 8.89%, while LRGF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.
COMT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 24.14%
- YTD
- 33.14%
- 1Y
- 36.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.55%
LRGF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.60M | $11.19M | $14.65M | |
| $11.35M | $13.93M | $11.55M |
COMT vs. LRGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 33.14% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | -18.66% | 10.81% | -6.67% | 11.70% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 8.94% | 16.48% | 26.59% | 25.85% | -14.77% | 25.01% | 11.11% | 26.11% | -9.66% | 21.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between COMT and LRGF is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | 0.27 |
The correlation between COMT and LRGF shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COMT vs. LRGF — Risk / Return Rank
COMT
LRGF
COMT vs. LRGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COMT | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 1.78 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 6.95 | -0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COMT vs. LRGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMT drawdown since its inception was -51.89%, which is greater than LRGF's maximum drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMT and LRGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COMT | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.89% | -36.03% | -15.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.57% | -8.92% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | -19.44% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -21.62% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.22% | -36.03% | -3.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.27% | -2.11% | -7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.93% | -4.51% | -19.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.46% | 2.28% | +3.18% |
Volatility
COMT vs. LRGF - Volatility Comparison
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) at 2.90%. This indicates that COMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COMT | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 2.90% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.58% | 9.83% | +9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.55% | 12.69% | +8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 17.07% | +4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 18.28% | +0.57% |
COMT vs. LRGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGF's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
COMT vs. LRGF - Dividend Comparison
COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than LRGF's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.81% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COMT and LRGF have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to LRGF (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COMT dropped -51.89% vs LRGF's -36.03%.
On 10-year performance, LRGF leads with 13.48% vs 8.89% for COMT. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LRGF has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LRGF has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.81%, compared with 1.09% for LRGF.
COMT is categorized as Commodities, while LRGF is Large Cap Blend Equities. COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index, while LRGF tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for COMT and 0.20% for LRGF.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COMT and LRGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer