COLD vs. XLK
COLD (Americold Realty Trust) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 5 years, COLD returned -14.39%/yr vs 23.83%/yr for XLK. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COLD vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a 15.93% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return.
COLD
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 22.67%
- YTD
- 15.93%
- 6M
- 36.92%
- 1Y
- -4.87%
- 3Y*
- -17.44%
- 5Y*
- -14.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
COLD vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 15.93% | -36.17% | -26.72% | 10.11% | -10.89% | -9.89% | 9.03% | 40.61% | 48.27% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -7.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between COLD and XLK is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2018 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between COLD and XLK has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COLD vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
COLD
XLK
COLD vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COLD | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.52 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 4.22 | -4.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 14.16 | -14.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COLD | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 3.24 | -3.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.96 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.42 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
COLD vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COLD | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -82.05% | +11.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.15% | -15.92% | -25.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.06% | -25.66% | -41.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.76% | -33.56% | -37.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.17% | -1.00% | -55.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -34.96% | +12.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.24% | 4.74% | +18.50% |
Volatility
COLD vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 19.62% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COLD | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.62% | 6.98% | +12.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.05% | 16.68% | +18.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.71% | 20.82% | +23.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.92% | 24.90% | +8.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 24.49% | +7.69% |
Dividends
COLD vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 6.30% | 7.15% | 4.11% | 2.91% | 3.11% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.28% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COLD and XLK have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COLD has higher volatility (19.62%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLD dropped -70.76% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COLD and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer