COLD vs. LAND
Compare and contrast key facts about Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND).
Performance
COLD vs. LAND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COLD vs. LAND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | -9.06% | -36.17% | -26.72% | 10.11% | -10.89% | -9.89% | 9.03% | 40.61% | 48.27% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 12.97% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -8.04% |
Fundamentals
COLD:
$3.28B
LAND:
$372.37M
COLD:
-$0.40
LAND:
-$0.29
COLD:
1.26
LAND:
4.86
COLD:
1.14
LAND:
0.61
COLD:
$2.60B
LAND:
$76.13M
COLD:
$104.66M
LAND:
$66.54M
COLD:
$379.41M
LAND:
$94.39M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a -9.06% return, which is significantly lower than LAND's 12.97% return.
COLD
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- -9.06%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- -42.73%
- 3Y*
- -22.67%
- 5Y*
- -18.47%
- 10Y*
- —
LAND
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -16.57%
- YTD
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 2.74%
- 3Y*
- -11.00%
- 5Y*
- -7.90%
- 10Y*
- 4.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COLD vs. LAND — Risk / Return Rank
COLD
LAND
COLD vs. LAND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COLD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | 0.09 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | 0.35 | -1.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.04 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.08 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 0.14 | -1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COLD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | 0.09 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 | -0.25 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.05 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between COLD and LAND is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
COLD vs. LAND - Dividend Comparison
COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than LAND's 5.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 8.03% | 7.15% | 4.11% | 2.91% | 3.11% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.28% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 5.49% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
Drawdowns
COLD vs. LAND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, smaller than the maximum LAND drawdown of -76.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and LAND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COLD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -76.45% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.32% | -20.69% | -30.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.76% | -76.45% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.62% | -71.12% | +5.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -30.07% | +8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.22% | 11.21% | +22.01% |
Volatility
COLD vs. LAND - Volatility Comparison
Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) at 9.62%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COLD | LAND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.48% | 9.62% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.23% | 21.93% | +9.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.66% | 31.50% | +11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.32% | 31.69% | -0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.41% | 29.95% | +1.46% |
Financials
COLD vs. LAND - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Americold Realty Trust and Gladstone Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities