COLD vs. LANDO
COLD (Americold Realty Trust) and LANDO (Gladstone Land Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Industrial industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, COLD returned -14.87%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for LANDO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COLD vs. LANDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than LANDO's 11.94% return.
COLD
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 17.27%
- 1Y
- -10.77%
- 3Y*
- -19.63%
- 5Y*
- -14.87%
- 10Y*
- —
LANDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 6M
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
COLD vs. LANDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 10.86% | -36.17% | -26.72% | 10.11% | -10.89% | -9.89% | 0.69% |
LANDO Gladstone Land Corporation | 11.94% | -3.70% | 16.65% | -12.07% | -6.00% | 12.14% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between COLD and LANDO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
COLD:
$4.00B
LANDO:
$827.54M
COLD:
-$0.39
LANDO:
-$0.31
COLD:
1.53
LANDO:
8.78
COLD:
1.42
LANDO:
1.20
COLD:
$2.60B
LANDO:
$86.33M
COLD:
-$101.19M
LANDO:
$12.83M
COLD:
$311.42M
LANDO:
$64.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COLD vs. LANDO — Risk / Return Rank
COLD
LANDO
COLD vs. LANDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COLD | LANDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 2.13 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 5.23 | -5.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COLD vs. LANDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, which is greater than LANDO's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and LANDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COLD | LANDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -33.50% | -37.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.83% | -5.65% | -34.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.06% | -18.71% | -48.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.76% | -33.50% | -37.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.09% | -4.56% | -53.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.47% | -9.26% | -13.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.88% | 2.29% | +19.59% |
Volatility
COLD vs. LANDO - Volatility Comparison
Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 9.91% compared to Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDO) at 4.47%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LANDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COLD | LANDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.91% | 4.47% | +5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.59% | 10.58% | +23.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.05% | 12.30% | +32.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.05% | 16.40% | +16.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.18% | 15.71% | +16.47% |
Dividends
COLD vs. LANDO - Dividend Comparison
COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, less than LANDO's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 6.59% | 7.15% | 4.11% | 2.91% | 3.11% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.28% | 2.75% |
LANDO Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.79% | 8.04% | 7.18% | 7.79% | 6.38% | 5.66% | 1.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
COLD vs. LANDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Americold Realty Trust and Gladstone Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COLD vs. LANDO - Profitability Comparison
COLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LANDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.
COLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of 14.29M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
LANDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.
COLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -13.56M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
LANDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COLD and LANDO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COLD has higher volatility (9.91%) compared to LANDO (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLD dropped -70.76% vs LANDO's -33.50%.
LANDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COLD and LANDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer