PortfoliosLab logo
COLD vs. LANDO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COLD and LANDO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

COLD vs. LANDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-37.07%
15.76%
COLD
LANDO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COLD:

-0.31

LANDO:

0.84

Sortino Ratio

COLD:

-0.25

LANDO:

1.27

Omega Ratio

COLD:

0.97

LANDO:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

COLD:

-0.18

LANDO:

0.63

Martin Ratio

COLD:

-0.49

LANDO:

2.54

Ulcer Index

COLD:

19.09%

LANDO:

5.50%

Daily Std Dev

COLD:

30.14%

LANDO:

16.75%

Max Drawdown

COLD:

-51.05%

LANDO:

-33.49%

Current Drawdown

COLD:

-44.34%

LANDO:

-9.92%

Fundamentals

EPS

COLD:

-$0.33

LANDO:

-$0.29

PS Ratio

COLD:

2.16

LANDO:

0.00

PB Ratio

COLD:

1.75

LANDO:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

COLD:

$2.00B

LANDO:

$64.96M

Gross Profit (TTM)

COLD:

$1.05B

LANDO:

$49.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

COLD:

$255.64M

LANDO:

$42.37M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than LANDO's 0.97% return.


COLD

YTD

-6.02%

1M

-7.15%

6M

-21.93%

1Y

-7.47%

5Y*

-5.91%

10Y*

N/A

LANDO

YTD

0.97%

1M

2.27%

6M

-2.33%

1Y

14.62%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COLD vs. LANDO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COLD is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COLD is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COLD is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COLD is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COLD is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COLD is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LANDO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LANDO is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LANDO is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LANDO is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LANDO is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LANDO is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LANDO is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COLD vs. LANDO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
COLD: -0.31
LANDO: 0.84
The chart of Sortino ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
COLD: -0.25
LANDO: 1.27
The chart of Omega ratio for COLD, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
COLD: 0.97
LANDO: 1.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.18, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
COLD: -0.18
LANDO: 0.63
The chart of Martin ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
COLD: -0.49
LANDO: 2.54

The current COLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the LANDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLD and LANDO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.31
0.84
COLD
LANDO

Dividends

COLD vs. LANDO - Dividend Comparison

COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than LANDO's 7.29% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
4.47%4.11%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.76%
LANDO
Gladstone Land Corporation
7.29%7.18%7.79%6.38%5.66%1.50%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

COLD vs. LANDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -51.05%, which is greater than LANDO's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and LANDO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-44.34%
-9.92%
COLD
LANDO

Volatility

COLD vs. LANDO - Volatility Comparison

Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 16.97% compared to Gladstone Land Corporation (LANDO) at 7.42%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LANDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
16.97%
7.42%
COLD
LANDO

Financials

COLD vs. LANDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Americold Realty Trust and Gladstone Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items