PortfoliosLab logo
COLD vs. CUBE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COLD and CUBE is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

COLD vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COLD:

-0.74

CUBE:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

COLD:

-0.94

CUBE:

0.38

Omega Ratio

COLD:

0.89

CUBE:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

COLD:

-0.44

CUBE:

0.11

Martin Ratio

COLD:

-1.10

CUBE:

0.24

Ulcer Index

COLD:

20.85%

CUBE:

14.96%

Daily Std Dev

COLD:

31.00%

CUBE:

24.83%

Max Drawdown

COLD:

-52.12%

CUBE:

-93.15%

Current Drawdown

COLD:

-49.82%

CUBE:

-19.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COLD:

$5.09B

CUBE:

$9.84B

EPS

COLD:

-$0.42

CUBE:

$1.68

PEG Ratio

COLD:

4.03

CUBE:

6.31

PS Ratio

COLD:

1.94

CUBE:

9.11

PB Ratio

COLD:

1.53

CUBE:

3.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

COLD:

$2.63B

CUBE:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COLD:

$803.49M

CUBE:

$703.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

COLD:

$289.62M

CUBE:

$695.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than CUBE's 1.11% return.


COLD

YTD

-15.28%

1M

-7.76%

6M

-18.03%

1Y

-22.65%

5Y*

-9.32%

10Y*

N/A

CUBE

YTD

1.11%

1M

10.36%

6M

-10.92%

1Y

3.97%

5Y*

17.30%

10Y*

9.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COLD vs. CUBE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COLD is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COLD is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COLD is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COLD is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COLD is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COLD is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CUBE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CUBE is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CUBE is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CUBE is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CUBE is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COLD vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current COLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the CUBE Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLD and CUBE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

COLD vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison

COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than CUBE's 4.87% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
4.96%4.11%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.87%3.57%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%

Drawdowns

COLD vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -52.12%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and CUBE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

COLD vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison

Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to CubeSmart (CUBE) at 7.84%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

COLD vs. CUBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Americold Realty Trust and CubeSmart. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
628.98M
273.04M
(COLD) Total Revenue
(CUBE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

COLD vs. CUBE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Americold Realty Trust and CubeSmart over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
32.7%
69.6%
(COLD) Gross Margin
(CUBE) Gross Margin
COLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 205.85M and revenue of 628.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

CUBE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a gross profit of 190.10M and revenue of 273.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.

COLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of 22.22M and revenue of 628.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.5%.

CUBE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported an operating income of 114.88M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.1%.

COLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -16.38M and revenue of 628.98M, resulting in a net margin of -2.6%.

CUBE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CubeSmart reported a net income of 89.20M and revenue of 273.04M, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.