COLD vs. CUBE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE).

Performance

COLD vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COLD vs. CUBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
COLD Americold Realty Trust	-9.06%	-36.17%	-26.72%	10.11%	-10.89%	-9.89%	9.03%	40.61%	48.27%
CUBE CubeSmart	3.18%	-11.59%	-4.53%	20.50%	-26.31%	74.59%	11.67%	14.12%	10.53%

Fundamentals

EPS COLD : -$0.40 CUBE : $2.18
PS Ratio COLD : 1.26 CUBE : 4.99
Total Revenue (TTM) COLD : $2.60B CUBE : $1.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) COLD : $104.66M CUBE : $511.19M
EBITDA (TTM) COLD : $379.41M CUBE : $703.57M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a -9.06% return, which is significantly lower than CUBE's 3.18% return.

COLD

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -12.66%
• YTD: -9.06%
• 6M: -2.78%
• 1Y: -42.73%
• 3Y*: -22.67%
• 5Y*: -18.47%
• 10Y*: —

CUBE

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -10.91%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: -7.33%
• 1Y: -9.59%
• 3Y*: -3.30%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: 5.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

COLD vs. CUBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COLD

COLD Risk / Return Rank: 8
COLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
COLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
COLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7
COLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
COLD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

CUBE

CUBE Risk / Return Rank: 24
CUBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CUBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CUBE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CUBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CUBE Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COLD vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COLD	CUBE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	-0.40	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.59	-0.41	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	0.95	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	-0.47	-0.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	-0.93	-0.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COLD vs. CUBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COLD Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the CUBE Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLD and CUBE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COLD	CUBE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.01	-0.40	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.59	0.12	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	0.22	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between COLD and CUBE is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

COLD vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison

COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than CUBE's 5.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COLD Americold Realty Trust	8.03%	7.15%	4.11%	2.91%	3.11%	2.68%	2.25%	2.28%	2.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CUBE CubeSmart	5.70%	5.77%	3.57%	4.27%	4.42%	2.55%	3.96%	4.10%	4.25%	3.84%	3.36%	2.25%

Drawdowns

COLD vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and CUBE.

Drawdown Indicators

	COLD	CUBE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.76%	-93.15%	+22.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.32%	-17.36%	-33.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.76%	-36.93%	-33.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.62%	-27.66%	-37.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.48%	-22.05%	+0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.22%	8.83%	+24.39%

Volatility

COLD vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison

Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to CubeSmart (CUBE) at 6.80%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COLD	CUBE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.48%	6.80%	+4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.23%	15.63%	+15.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.66%	24.38%	+18.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.32%	25.22%	+6.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.41%	25.35%	+6.06%

Financials