PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
COLD vs. CUBE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between COLD and CUBE is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

COLD vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-15.66%
-5.87%
COLD
CUBE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COLD:

-1.05

CUBE:

-0.14

Sortino Ratio

COLD:

-1.40

CUBE:

-0.03

Omega Ratio

COLD:

0.83

CUBE:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

COLD:

-0.63

CUBE:

-0.14

Martin Ratio

COLD:

-1.77

CUBE:

-0.40

Ulcer Index

COLD:

15.11%

CUBE:

7.89%

Daily Std Dev

COLD:

25.52%

CUBE:

23.15%

Max Drawdown

COLD:

-43.13%

CUBE:

-93.15%

Current Drawdown

COLD:

-42.40%

CUBE:

-22.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COLD:

$6.37B

CUBE:

$10.36B

EPS

COLD:

-$1.02

CUBE:

$1.78

PEG Ratio

COLD:

4.03

CUBE:

6.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

COLD:

$2.68B

CUBE:

$1.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COLD:

$620.93M

CUBE:

$596.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

COLD:

$212.01M

CUBE:

$691.85M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a -28.73% return, which is significantly lower than CUBE's -7.00% return.


COLD

YTD

-28.73%

1M

-5.06%

6M

-15.72%

1Y

-26.24%

5Y*

-6.74%

10Y*

N/A

CUBE

YTD

-7.00%

1M

-14.78%

6M

-5.81%

1Y

-3.39%

5Y*

10.10%

10Y*

10.34%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

COLD vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COLD, currently valued at -1.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-1.05-0.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for COLD, currently valued at -1.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-1.40-0.03
The chart of Omega ratio for COLD, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.831.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for COLD, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.63-0.14
The chart of Martin ratio for COLD, currently valued at -1.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-1.77-0.40
COLD
CUBE

The current COLD Sharpe Ratio is -1.05, which is lower than the CUBE Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COLD and CUBE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.05
-0.14
COLD
CUBE

Dividends

COLD vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison

COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than CUBE's 4.89% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
4.18%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CUBE
CubeSmart
4.89%4.27%4.42%2.55%3.96%4.10%4.25%3.84%3.36%2.25%2.49%2.89%

Drawdowns

COLD vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and CUBE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-42.40%
-22.75%
COLD
CUBE

Volatility

COLD vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison

Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to CubeSmart (CUBE) at 6.80%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.67%
6.80%
COLD
CUBE

Financials

COLD vs. CUBE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Americold Realty Trust and CubeSmart. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab