COLD vs. CUBE
COLD (Americold Realty Trust) and CUBE (CubeSmart) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Industrial industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, COLD returned -14.93%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for CUBE. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
COLD vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than CUBE's 20.04% return.
COLD
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -13.24%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 1Y
- -3.75%
- 3Y*
- -20.58%
- 5Y*
- -14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.94%
CUBE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 13.61%
- YTD
- 20.04%
- 1Y
- 9.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.08M | $63.19M | $69.47M | |
CUBE CubeSmart | $110.24M | $93.57M | $86.80M |
COLD vs. CUBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 13.43% | -36.17% | -26.72% | 10.11% | -10.89% | -9.89% | 9.03% | 40.61% | 50.55% |
CUBE CubeSmart | 20.04% | -11.59% | -4.53% | 20.50% | -26.31% | 74.59% | 11.67% | 14.12% | 10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between COLD and CUBE is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between COLD and CUBE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
COLD:
$4.02B
CUBE:
$9.42B
COLD:
-$0.39
CUBE:
$1.46
COLD:
1.55
CUBE:
8.34
COLD:
1.43
CUBE:
3.66
COLD:
$2.60B
CUBE:
$1.14B
COLD:
-$101.19M
CUBE:
$86.29M
COLD:
$311.42M
CUBE:
$704.64M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COLD vs. CUBE — Risk / Return Rank
COLD
CUBE
COLD vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COLD | CUBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.11 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 0.77 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 1.67 | -1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COLD vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and CUBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COLD | CUBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -93.15% | +22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.29% | -16.49% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.06% | -31.95% | -35.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.52% | -36.93% | -32.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.12% | -15.84% | -41.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.88% | -22.01% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.25% | 7.61% | +11.64% |
Volatility
COLD vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison
Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to CubeSmart (CUBE) at 7.40%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COLD | CUBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 7.40% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.84% | 17.06% | +17.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.08% | 23.05% | +23.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.50% | 25.53% | +7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 25.43% | +6.90% |
Dividends
COLD vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison
COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than CUBE's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 6.53% | 7.15% | 4.11% | 2.91% | 3.11% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.28% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CUBE CubeSmart | 5.09% | 5.77% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.42% | 2.55% | 3.96% | 4.10% | 4.25% | 3.84% | 3.36% | 2.25% |
Financials
COLD vs. CUBE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Americold Realty Trust and CubeSmart. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COLD vs. CUBE - Profitability Comparison
COLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CUBE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CubeSmart reported a gross profit of 78.79M and revenue of 286.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.5%.
COLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of 14.29M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
CUBE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CubeSmart reported an operating income of -395.00K and revenue of 286.49M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.1%.
COLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -13.56M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.
CUBE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CubeSmart reported a net income of 89.59M and revenue of 286.49M, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COLD and CUBE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COLD has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to CUBE (7.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COLD dropped -70.76% vs CUBE's -93.15%.
CUBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COLD and CUBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer