COLD vs. CUBE
Compare and contrast key facts about Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COLD or CUBE.
Key characteristics
| COLD | CUBE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -22.67% | 8.17% |
| 1Y Return | -5.79% | 39.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.65% | 0.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.69% | 14.08% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.24 | 1.61 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.15 | 2.27 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.98 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.15 | 1.22 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.47 | 5.67 |
| Ulcer Index | 12.85% | 6.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.98% | 23.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.13% | -93.15% |
| Current Drawdown | -37.50% | -10.15% |
Fundamentals
| COLD | CUBE | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.51B | $11.04B |
| EPS | -$1.02 | $1.78 |
| PEG Ratio | 4.03 | 6.31 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $2.68B | $1.06B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $620.93M | $596.82M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $489.12M | $692.99M |
Correlation
The correlation between COLD and CUBE is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
COLD vs. CUBE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, COLD achieves a -22.67% return, which is significantly lower than CUBE's 8.17% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COLD vs. CUBE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Americold Realty Trust (COLD) and CubeSmart (CUBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COLD vs. CUBE - Dividend Comparison
COLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than CUBE's 4.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 3.86% | 2.91% | 3.11% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.28% | 2.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CUBE CubeSmart | 4.20% | 4.27% | 4.42% | 2.55% | 3.96% | 4.10% | 4.25% | 3.84% | 3.36% | 2.25% | 2.49% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
COLD vs. CUBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COLD drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, smaller than the maximum CUBE drawdown of -93.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COLD and CUBE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COLD vs. CUBE - Volatility Comparison
Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a higher volatility of 10.06% compared to CubeSmart (CUBE) at 8.17%. This indicates that COLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CUBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
COLD vs. CUBE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Americold Realty Trust and CubeSmart. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities