PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIW vs. RDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COIW vs. RDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COIW vs. RDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -28.55% return, which is significantly lower than RDTE's 0.99% return.


COIW

1D
-0.98%
1M
-8.42%
YTD
-28.55%
6M
-58.34%
1Y
-11.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RDTE

1D
0.67%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.65%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COIW vs. RDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

COIW vs. RDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW
COIW Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

RDTE
RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. RDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIWRDTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

0.92

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.51

1.28

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.18

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

1.31

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.25

4.68

-4.93

COIW vs. RDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the RDTE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and RDTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIWRDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

0.92

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.65

-1.11

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and RDTE is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

COIW vs. RDTE - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 202.89%, more than RDTE's 51.50% yield.


TTM20252024
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
202.89%120.37%0.00%
RDTE
Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
51.50%50.16%10.70%

Drawdowns

COIW vs. RDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than RDTE's maximum drawdown of -24.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and RDTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COIWRDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.55%

-24.32%

-50.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.55%

-13.91%

-60.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.65%

-5.96%

-61.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.68%

-5.04%

-28.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.63%

3.90%

+34.73%

Volatility

COIW vs. RDTE - Volatility Comparison

COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 28.20% compared to Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) at 6.85%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COIWRDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.20%

6.85%

+21.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.40%

13.07%

+50.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.52%

19.72%

+71.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.23%

19.45%

+73.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.23%

19.45%

+73.78%