PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIW vs. HOOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIW vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with COIW having a -34.53% return and HOOW slightly higher at -34.08%.


COIW

1D
-7.79%
1M
-23.73%
YTD
-34.53%
6M
-48.92%
1Y
-47.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOW

1D
-7.51%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-34.08%
6M
-46.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
-34.53%-31.57%
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
-34.08%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and HOOW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.75

COIW vs. HOOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COIW
HOOW

Financial Services

6.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

COIW
6.0%
HOOW
3.3%

Basic Materials

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Communication Services

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Consumer Cyclical

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Consumer Defensive

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Energy

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Healthcare

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Industrials

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Real Estate

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Technology

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Utilities

COIW

-

HOOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIW vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW
COIW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIWHOOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

COIW vs. HOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIWHOOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

-0.04

-0.42

Drawdowns

COIW vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than HOOW's maximum drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and HOOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIWHOOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.55%

-65.74%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.36%

-55.23%

-15.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-29.13%

-8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.70%

Volatility

COIW vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIWHOOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.90%

83.86%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.07%

83.86%

+7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.07%

83.86%

+7.21%

COIW vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COIW and HOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

COIW vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 226.68%, more than HOOW's 163.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
226.68%120.37%
HOOW
Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF
163.90%67.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


COIW and HOOW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COIW and HOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 226.68%, compared with 163.90% for HOOW.

COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIW and HOOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer