COIW vs. HOOW
COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
COIW vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with COIW having a -34.53% return and HOOW slightly higher at -34.08%.
COIW
- 1D
- -7.79%
- 1M
- -23.73%
- YTD
- -34.53%
- 6M
- -48.92%
- 1Y
- -47.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOW
- 1D
- -7.51%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- -34.08%
- 6M
- -46.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -34.53% | -31.57% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -34.08% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIW and HOOW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.75 |
COIW vs. HOOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COIW
HOOW
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
COIW
HOOW
Basic Materials
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Communication Services
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Consumer Cyclical
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Consumer Defensive
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Energy
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Healthcare
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Industrials
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Real Estate
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Technology
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Utilities
COIW
-
HOOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIW vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank
COIW
HOOW
COIW vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COIW | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIW | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | -0.04 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
COIW vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than HOOW's maximum drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and HOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIW | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.55% | -65.74% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.36% | -55.23% | -15.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -29.13% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.70% | — | — |
Volatility
COIW vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIW | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.90% | 83.86% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.07% | 83.86% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.07% | 83.86% | +7.21% |
COIW vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COIW and HOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
COIW vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison
COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 226.68%, more than HOOW's 163.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 226.68% | 120.37% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 163.90% | 67.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIW and HOOW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COIW and HOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 226.68%, compared with 163.90% for HOOW.
COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities.
Find the right allocation for COIW and HOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer