COIW vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -69.18% vs 299.04% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

COIW vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -36.27% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -27.52% return.

COIW

• 1D: -4.37%
• 1M: -6.40%
• 6M: -40.21%
• YTD: -36.27%
• 1Y: -69.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 38.88%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: -27.52%
• 1Y: 299.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	-36.27%	-25.92%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-27.52%	2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and MSTZ is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	-0.76

The correlation between COIW and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.79 to -0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

COIW vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW

COIW Risk / Return Rank: 2
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COIW	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.85	2.03	-2.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.45	2.49	-3.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.33	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	3.55	-4.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	6.84	-8.16

COIW vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COIW vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -75.01%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	COIW	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.01%	-99.38%	+24.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.01%	-84.89%	+9.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.14%	-97.53%	+26.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.78%	-94.55%	+53.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.58%	43.95%	+8.63%

Volatility

COIW vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) is 19.62%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 55.03%. This indicates that COIW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COIW	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.62%	55.03%	-35.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.30%	134.45%	-70.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.07%	148.58%	-66.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.66%	170.73%	-81.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.66%	170.73%	-81.07%

COIW vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

COIW vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 222.64%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	222.64%	120.37%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COIW and MSTZ in my portfolio?

COIW and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COIW or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (55.03%) compared to COIW (19.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -75.01% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, COIW or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 299.04% vs -69.18% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, COIW has been the lower-risk option at 19.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COIW or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 299.04% return vs -69.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COIW or MSTZ?

COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COIW or MSTZ?

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 222.64%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between COIW and MSTZ?

COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.