PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COIW vs. MAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COIW vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -34.53% return, which is significantly lower than MAGX's 1.49% return.


COIW

1D
-7.79%
1M
-23.73%
YTD
-34.53%
6M
-48.92%
1Y
-47.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGX

1D
-2.59%
1M
3.29%
YTD
1.49%
6M
0.41%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
-34.53%-23.77%
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
1.49%25.16%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and MAGX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.57

The correlation between COIW and MAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

COIW vs. MAGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COIW
MAGX

Financial Services

6.0%
25.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

COIW
6.0%
MAGX
25.0%

Basic Materials

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Communication Services

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Consumer Cyclical

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Consumer Defensive

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Energy

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Healthcare

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Industrials

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Real Estate

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Technology

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Utilities

COIW

-

MAGX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COIW vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW
COIW Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COIWMAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.22

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

1.37

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

4.21

-5.24

COIW vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the MAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COIW and MAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COIWMAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

1.28

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

0.85

-1.31

Drawdowns

COIW vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than MAGX's maximum drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and MAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COIWMAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.55%

-54.19%

-20.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.55%

-37.24%

-37.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.36%

-7.49%

-62.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-13.78%

-23.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.70%

12.09%

+34.61%

Volatility

COIW vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison

COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 22.46% compared to Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) at 9.19%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COIWMAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.46%

9.19%

+13.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.94%

28.81%

+33.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.90%

39.88%

+45.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.07%

53.52%

+37.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.07%

53.52%

+37.55%

COIW vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

COIW vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 226.68%, more than MAGX's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
COIW
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF
226.68%120.37%0.00%
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
2.02%2.05%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


COIW and MAGX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COIW has higher volatility (22.46%) compared to MAGX (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -74.55% vs MAGX's -54.19%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 50.73% vs -47.92% for COIW. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGX has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 50.73% return vs -47.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COIW.

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 226.68%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.

COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 0.95% for MAGX.

MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COIW and MAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer