COIW vs. MAGX
COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -47.92% vs 50.73% for MAGX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MAGX.
Performance
COIW vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -34.53% return, which is significantly lower than MAGX's 1.49% return.
COIW
- 1D
- -7.79%
- 1M
- -23.73%
- YTD
- -34.53%
- 6M
- -48.92%
- 1Y
- -47.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGX
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -34.53% | -23.77% |
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.49% | 25.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIW and MAGX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.57 |
The correlation between COIW and MAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
COIW vs. MAGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COIW
MAGX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
COIW
MAGX
Basic Materials
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Communication Services
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Consumer Cyclical
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Consumer Defensive
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Energy
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Healthcare
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Industrials
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Real Estate
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Technology
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Utilities
COIW
-
MAGX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIW vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank
COIW
MAGX
COIW vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COIW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.22 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 1.37 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 4.21 | -5.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | 1.28 | -1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 0.85 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
COIW vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than MAGX's maximum drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and MAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.55% | -54.19% | -20.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.55% | -37.24% | -37.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.36% | -7.49% | -62.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -13.78% | -23.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.70% | 12.09% | +34.61% |
Volatility
COIW vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 22.46% compared to Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) at 9.19%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIW | MAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.46% | 9.19% | +13.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.94% | 28.81% | +33.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.90% | 39.88% | +45.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.07% | 53.52% | +37.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.07% | 53.52% | +37.55% |
COIW vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIW vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison
COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 226.68%, more than MAGX's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 226.68% | 120.37% | 0.00% |
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.02% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIW and MAGX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIW has higher volatility (22.46%) compared to MAGX (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -74.55% vs MAGX's -54.19%.
On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 50.73% vs -47.92% for COIW. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGX has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 50.73% return vs -47.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COIW.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 226.68%, compared with 2.02% for MAGX.
COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 0.95% for MAGX.
MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COIW and MAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer