COIW vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

COIW vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

COIW

• 1D: -7.79%
• 1M: -23.73%
• YTD: -34.53%
• 6M: -48.92%
• 1Y: -47.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 64.14%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COIW vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	-6.91%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	151.12%

Correlation

The correlation between COIW and DRAM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026	0.34

COIW vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COIW	DRAM
Financial Services	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

COIW vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COIW

COIW Risk / Return Rank: 4
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 5
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COIW vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COIW	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COIW	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.46	341.95	-342.41

Drawdowns

COIW vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -10.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	COIW	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.55%	-10.46%	-64.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.36%	0.00%	-70.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.72%	-1.64%	-36.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.70%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COIW	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.90%	73.92%	+10.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.07%	73.92%	+17.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.07%	73.92%	+17.15%

COIW vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

COIW vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 226.68%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	226.68%	120.37%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COIW and DRAM in my portfolio?

COIW and DRAM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COIW or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COIW or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COIW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COIW or DRAM?

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 226.68%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between COIW and DRAM?

COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 0.65% for DRAM.