COIW vs. BUCK
COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COIW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COIW returned -46.46% vs 7.46% for BUCK. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COIW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
COIW vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COIW achieves a -33.93% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.99% return.
COIW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -20.57%
- YTD
- -33.93%
- 6M
- -47.79%
- 1Y
- -46.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIW vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | -33.93% | -23.77% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.99% | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between COIW and BUCK is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.01 |
COIW vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COIW
BUCK
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
COIW
BUCK
Basic Materials
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Communication Services
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Consumer Cyclical
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Consumer Defensive
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Energy
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Healthcare
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Industrials
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Real Estate
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Technology
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Utilities
COIW
-
BUCK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COIW vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
COIW
BUCK
COIW vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COIW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.51 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 5.73 | -6.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 30.33 | -31.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COIW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 2.42 | -2.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | 1.48 | -1.93 |
Drawdowns
COIW vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COIW drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COIW and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COIW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.55% | -5.43% | -69.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.55% | -1.31% | -73.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.08% | 0.00% | -70.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.82% | -0.49% | -37.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.91% | 0.25% | +46.66% |
Volatility
COIW vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a higher volatility of 22.47% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that COIW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COIW | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.47% | 0.70% | +21.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.92% | 1.52% | +60.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 84.69% | 3.14% | +81.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.93% | 3.48% | +87.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.93% | 3.48% | +87.45% |
COIW vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
COIW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
COIW vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
COIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 224.62%, more than BUCK's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.41% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF | 224.62% | 120.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COIW and BUCK have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIW has higher volatility (22.47%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COIW dropped -74.55% vs BUCK's -5.43%.
On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.46% vs -46.46% for COIW. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.46% return vs -46.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COIW.
COIW has the higher dividend yield at 224.62%, compared with 7.41% for BUCK.
COIW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COIW and 0.35% for BUCK.
BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COIW and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer