COHR vs. FLKR
COHR (Coherent, Inc.) is a stock, while FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, COHR returned 43.17%/yr vs 19.64%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COHR vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COHR achieves a 124.22% return, which is significantly higher than FLKR's 112.26% return.
COHR
- 1D
- 7.48%
- 1M
- 8.21%
- YTD
- 124.22%
- 6M
- 131.91%
- 1Y
- 434.88%
- 3Y*
- 96.11%
- 5Y*
- 43.17%
- 10Y*
- 35.53%
FLKR
- 1D
- 7.15%
- 1M
- 17.17%
- YTD
- 112.26%
- 6M
- 128.12%
- 1Y
- 212.42%
- 3Y*
- 49.62%
- 5Y*
- 19.64%
- 10Y*
- —
COHR vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COHR Coherent, Inc. | 124.22% | 94.84% | 117.62% | 24.02% | -48.63% | -10.04% | 125.60% | 3.73% | -30.86% | 13.13% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 112.26% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between COHR and FLKR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COHR vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
COHR
FLKR
COHR vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coherent, Inc. (COHR) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COHR | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.63 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.54 | 9.29 | +7.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.32 | 32.27 | +13.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COHR vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COHR drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COHR and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COHR | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.89% | -50.06% | -30.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.52% | -23.03% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.85% | -26.39% | -28.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.87% | -49.51% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -2.76% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -22.02% | -12.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.66% | 6.61% | +3.05% |
Volatility
COHR vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
Coherent, Inc. (COHR) has a higher volatility of 28.85% compared to Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) at 26.71%. This indicates that COHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COHR | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.85% | 26.71% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.84% | 42.52% | +15.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.98% | 46.33% | +27.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.69% | 29.77% | +31.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.62% | 28.47% | +28.15% |
Dividends
COHR vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
COHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COHR Coherent, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.82% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COHR and FLKR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COHR has higher volatility (28.85%) compared to FLKR (26.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COHR dropped -80.89% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
COHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 4.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COHR and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer