COGT vs. HOOD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COGT (Cogent Biosciences, Inc.) and HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) are both stocks. COGT operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while HOOD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, COGT returned 35.49%/yr vs 107.01%/yr for HOOD. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

COGT vs. HOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COGT achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly higher than HOOD's -26.75% return.

COGT

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -12.17%
• YTD: -9.18%
• 6M: -17.62%
• 1Y: 457.17%
• 3Y*: 35.49%
• 5Y*: 32.16%
• 10Y*: —

HOOD

• 1D: -6.02%
• 1M: 8.23%
• YTD: -26.75%
• 6M: -38.01%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 107.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COGT vs. HOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
COGT Cogent Biosciences, Inc.	-9.18%	355.38%	32.65%	-49.13%	34.73%	37.50%
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc.	-26.75%	203.54%	192.46%	56.51%	-54.17%	-48.99%

Correlation

The correlation between COGT and HOOD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021	0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap COGT : $2.17B HOOD : $75.81B
EPS COGT : -$3.89 HOOD : $2.07
PB Ratio COGT : 3.76 HOOD : 7.83
Total Revenue (TTM) COGT : $0.00 HOOD : $3.91B
Gross Profit (TTM) COGT : -$2.33M HOOD : $2.86B
EBITDA (TTM) COGT : -$363.18M HOOD : $1.80B

Return for Risk

COGT vs. HOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COGT

COGT Risk / Return Rank: 98
COGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
COGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
COGT Omega Ratio Rank: 98
COGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
COGT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

HOOD

HOOD Risk / Return Rank: 47
HOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
HOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
HOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 47
HOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
HOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COGT vs. HOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COGT	HOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.53	0.23	+3.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.68	0.83	+6.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.90	1.10	+0.80
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	17.88	0.27	+17.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	44.72	0.50	+44.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COGT vs. HOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COGT Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the HOOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COGT and HOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COGT	HOOD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53	0.23	+3.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.27	-0.29

Drawdowns

COGT vs. HOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COGT drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than HOOD's maximum drawdown of -90.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COGT and HOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	COGT	HOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.09%	-90.21%	-7.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.79%	-57.26%	+31.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.87%	-57.26%	-12.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.91%	-45.66%	-6.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-77.82%	-60.99%	-16.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.29%	30.88%	-20.59%

Volatility

COGT vs. HOOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) is 12.42%, while Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a volatility of 21.14%. This indicates that COGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COGT	HOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.42%	21.14%	-8.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.76%	50.03%	-18.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	130.68%	68.61%	+62.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.04%	73.99%	+21.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	166.35%	73.99%	+92.36%

Dividends

COGT vs. HOOD - Dividend Comparison

Neither COGT nor HOOD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COGT and HOOD in my portfolio?

COGT and HOOD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COGT or HOOD?

HOOD has higher volatility (21.14%) compared to COGT (12.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COGT dropped -98.09% vs HOOD's -90.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.