PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COGT vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COGT vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COGT achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.04% return.


COGT

1D
-1.53%
1M
-12.17%
YTD
-9.18%
6M
-17.62%
1Y
457.17%
3Y*
35.49%
5Y*
32.16%
10Y*

AVDV

1D
-0.73%
1M
3.98%
YTD
16.04%
6M
19.54%
1Y
44.23%
3Y*
28.01%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COGT vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
COGT
Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
-9.18%355.38%32.65%-49.13%34.73%-23.60%289.93%-55.83%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
16.04%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between COGT and AVDV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COGT vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COGT
COGT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
COGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
COGT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
COGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
COGT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COGT vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COGTAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.52

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.88

3.37

+14.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.72

13.67

+31.05

COGT vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COGT Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COGT and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COGTAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

2.86

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.80

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.80

-0.82

Drawdowns

COGT vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COGT drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than AVDV's maximum drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COGT and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COGTAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.09%

-43.01%

-55.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.79%

-13.19%

-12.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.87%

-14.17%

-55.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.34%

-28.08%

-48.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.91%

-1.35%

-50.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-6.77%

-71.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.29%

3.24%

+7.05%

Volatility

COGT vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 4.92%. This indicates that COGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COGTAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.42%

4.92%

+7.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.76%

13.07%

+18.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.68%

15.56%

+115.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.04%

17.30%

+77.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

166.35%

19.73%

+146.62%

Dividends

COGT vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

COGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.74%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
COGT
Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COGT and AVDV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COGT has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to AVDV (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COGT dropped -98.09% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

COGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COGT and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer