COGT vs. NFLY
COGT (Cogent Biosciences, Inc.) is a stock, while NFLY (YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, COGT returned 457.17% vs -27.58% for NFLY. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COGT vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with COGT having a -9.18% return and NFLY slightly higher at -8.84%.
COGT
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -12.17%
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -17.62%
- 1Y
- 457.17%
- 3Y*
- 35.49%
- 5Y*
- 32.16%
- 10Y*
- —
NFLY
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- YTD
- -8.84%
- 6M
- -15.99%
- 1Y
- -27.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COGT vs. NFLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COGT Cogent Biosciences, Inc. | -9.18% | 355.38% | 32.65% | -50.46% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.84% | 1.66% | 66.37% | 3.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between COGT and NFLY is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2023 | 0.10 |
The correlation between COGT and NFLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COGT vs. NFLY — Risk / Return Rank
COGT
NFLY
COGT vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COGT | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 0.82 | +1.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.88 | -0.74 | +18.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.72 | -1.34 | +46.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COGT | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53 | -1.00 | +4.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.64 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
COGT vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COGT drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than NFLY's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COGT and NFLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COGT | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -37.18% | -60.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.79% | -37.18% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.91% | -32.30% | -19.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -8.51% | -69.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.29% | 20.55% | -10.26% |
Volatility
COGT vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison
Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) at 6.12%. This indicates that COGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COGT | NFLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.42% | 6.12% | +6.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.76% | 21.18% | +10.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 130.68% | 27.67% | +103.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.04% | 28.32% | +66.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 166.35% | 28.32% | +138.03% |
Dividends
COGT vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison
COGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COGT Cogent Biosciences, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFLY YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 58.24% | 61.53% | 49.91% | 11.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COGT and NFLY have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COGT has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to NFLY (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COGT dropped -98.09% vs NFLY's -37.18%.
COGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COGT and NFLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer