PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COGT vs. VISN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COGT vs. VISN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and Vistance Networks, Inc (VISN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COGT achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly lower than VISN's 191.71% return.


COGT

1D
-1.53%
1M
-12.17%
YTD
-9.18%
6M
-17.62%
1Y
457.17%
3Y*
35.49%
5Y*
32.16%
10Y*

VISN

1D
-1.85%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
191.71%
6M
178.06%
1Y
781.44%
3Y*
125.37%
5Y*
20.42%
10Y*
5.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COGT vs. VISN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
COGT
Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
-9.18%355.38%32.65%-49.13%34.73%-23.60%289.93%-83.64%-60.40%
VISN
Vistance Networks, Inc
191.71%247.98%84.75%-61.63%-33.42%-17.61%-5.57%-13.42%-58.99%

Correlation

The correlation between COGT and VISN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2018

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COGT:

$2.17B

VISN:

$2.75B

EPS

COGT:

-$3.89

VISN:

$0.00

PB Ratio

COGT:

3.76

VISN:

0.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

COGT:

$0.00

VISN:

$4.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COGT:

-$2.33M

VISN:

$1.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

COGT:

-$363.18M

VISN:

$811.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COGT vs. VISN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COGT
COGT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
COGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
COGT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
COGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
COGT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VISN
VISN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VISN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISN Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISN Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VISN Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISN Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COGT vs. VISN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and Vistance Networks, Inc (VISN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COGTVISNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

2.34

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

17.88

48.55

-30.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.72

97.42

-52.70

COGT vs. VISN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COGT Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is lower than the VISN Sharpe Ratio of 5.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COGT and VISN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COGTVISNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

5.29

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.20

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.14

-0.17

Drawdowns

COGT vs. VISN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COGT drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, roughly equal to the maximum VISN drawdown of -97.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COGT and VISN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COGTVISNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.09%

-97.95%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.79%

-16.25%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.87%

-86.71%

+16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.34%

-96.04%

+19.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.91%

-4.57%

-47.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-49.47%

-28.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.29%

8.08%

+2.21%

Volatility

COGT vs. VISN - Volatility Comparison

Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to Vistance Networks, Inc (VISN) at 9.29%. This indicates that COGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VISN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COGTVISNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.42%

9.29%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.76%

81.76%

-50.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.68%

149.16%

-18.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.04%

103.04%

-8.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

166.35%

80.72%

+85.63%

Dividends

COGT vs. VISN - Dividend Comparison

COGT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 163.80%.


PositionTTM
COGT
Cogent Biosciences, Inc.
0.00%
VISN
Vistance Networks, Inc
163.80%

Financials

COGT vs. VISN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cogent Biosciences, Inc. and Vistance Networks, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B202220232024202520260
471.80M
(COGT) Total Revenue
(VISN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


COGT and VISN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COGT has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to VISN (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COGT dropped -98.09% vs VISN's -97.95%.

VISN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 3.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COGT and VISN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer