PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COCO vs. CM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COCO vs. CM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COCO achieves a 58.50% return, which is significantly higher than CM's 24.28% return.


COCO

1D
0.45%
1M
10.49%
YTD
58.50%
6M
57.11%
1Y
139.24%
3Y*
42.82%
5Y*
10Y*

CM

1D
-1.05%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
24.28%
6M
22.27%
1Y
67.98%
3Y*
43.12%
5Y*
20.06%
10Y*
17.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COCO vs. CM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
58.50%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-27.33%
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
24.28%49.02%37.83%27.23%-25.71%-2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between COCO and CM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COCO:

$5.08B

CM:

$75.95B

EPS

COCO:

$1.38

CM:

CA$12.14

PE Ratio

COCO:

60.89

CM:

13.01

PEG Ratio

COCO:

0.51

CM:

1.61

PS Ratio

COCO:

7.67

CM:

2.07

PB Ratio

COCO:

14.43

CM:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

COCO:

$658.62M

CM:

CA$61.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COCO:

$246.32M

CM:

CA$28.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

COCO:

$100.45M

CM:

CA$13.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COCO vs. CM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CM
CM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COCO vs. CM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COCOCMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.61

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.86

6.43

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.41

25.18

-8.77

COCO vs. CM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COCO Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the CM Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COCO and CM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COCO vs. CM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COCO drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, smaller than the maximum CM drawdown of -71.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COCO and CM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COCOCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.97%

-71.70%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.23%

-10.79%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.55%

-19.47%

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.53%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.76%

-14.65%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.28%

2.75%

+5.53%

Volatility

COCO vs. CM - Volatility Comparison

The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) has a higher volatility of 9.69% compared to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 7.78%. This indicates that COCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COCOCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.69%

7.78%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.61%

16.02%

+25.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.25%

19.03%

+33.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.71%

21.41%

+35.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.71%

22.61%

+34.10%

Dividends

COCO vs. CM - Dividend Comparison

COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.65%3.17%4.21%5.88%7.77%4.08%5.06%6.47%5.48%5.28%5.93%6.71%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

COCO vs. CM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Vita Coco Company, Inc. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
179.77M
15.22B
(COCO) Total Revenue
(CM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. COCO values in USD, CM values in CAD

COCO vs. CM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Vita Coco Company, Inc. and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
40.0%
48.4%
Portfolio components
COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.81M and revenue of 179.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

CM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

CM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

CM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COCO and CM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COCO has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to CM (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COCO dropped -56.97% vs CM's -71.70%.

CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COCO and CM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer