PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNYA vs. KGRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNYA vs. KGRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than KGRN's 0.89% return.


CNYA

1D
0.04%
1M
2.34%
YTD
9.30%
6M
13.79%
1Y
37.95%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
-1.06%
10Y*

KGRN

1D
-2.40%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
0.89%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
2.74%
5Y*
-7.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNYA vs. KGRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
9.30%26.48%10.78%-13.76%-26.51%3.53%41.54%35.95%-26.56%2.28%
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
0.89%21.45%-1.11%-14.75%-40.45%5.91%138.49%12.12%-29.32%-0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CNYA and KGRN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2017

0.67

The correlation between CNYA and KGRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CNYA vs. KGRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNYA
KGRN

Technology

30.0%
11.6%

Industrials

18.3%
26.5%

Financial Services

17.0%

-

Basic Materials

10.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
36.8%

Healthcare

3.8%

-

Energy

3.2%
3.6%

Utilities

3.2%
21.2%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Technology

CNYA
30.0%
KGRN
11.6%

Industrials

CNYA
18.3%
KGRN
26.5%

Financial Services

CNYA
17.0%
KGRN

-

Basic Materials

CNYA
10.6%
KGRN

-

Consumer Defensive

CNYA
6.7%
KGRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

CNYA
5.7%
KGRN
36.8%

Healthcare

CNYA
3.8%
KGRN

-

Energy

CNYA
3.2%
KGRN
3.6%

Utilities

CNYA
3.2%
KGRN
21.2%

Real Estate

CNYA
0.7%
KGRN

-

Communication Services

CNYA
0.6%
KGRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNYA vs. KGRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNYA
CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

KGRN
KGRN Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
KGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
KGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYA vs. KGRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNYAKGRNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

0.29

+1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

0.57

+2.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.07

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

0.39

+4.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.84

0.67

+14.17

CNYA vs. KGRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYA Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the KGRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYA and KGRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNYAKGRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

0.29

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

-0.22

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.07

+0.20

Drawdowns

CNYA vs. KGRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum KGRN drawdown of -66.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and KGRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNYAKGRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-66.24%

+16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-17.26%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-42.19%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.70%

-63.60%

+18.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.42%

-47.17%

+33.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-33.95%

+13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

10.08%

-7.52%

Volatility

CNYA vs. KGRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) is 6.42%, while KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that CNYA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNYAKGRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

7.47%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

15.12%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

23.07%

-5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.81%

34.75%

-10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.56%

32.86%

-9.30%

CNYA vs. KGRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KGRN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNYA vs. KGRN - Dividend Comparison

CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than KGRN's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
1.75%1.92%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.06%1.21%3.92%0.97%1.38%
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
0.85%0.85%1.49%0.74%1.98%0.41%0.01%5.88%2.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNYA and KGRN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGRN has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to CNYA (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNYA dropped -49.49% vs KGRN's -66.24%.

On 5-year performance, CNYA leads with -1.06% vs -7.68% for KGRN. On fees, CNYA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, CNYA has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CNYA has performed better with a -1.06% return vs -7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CNYA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KGRN.

CNYA has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.85% for KGRN.

CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while KGRN tracks MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNYA and 0.79% for KGRN.

CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNYA and KGRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer