PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNYA vs. CXSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNYA vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYA achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than CXSE's -3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CNYA has underperformed CXSE with an annualized return of 6.74%, while CXSE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.10% annualized return.


CNYA

1D
1.92%
1M
1.81%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.36%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
6.74%

CXSE

1D
0.79%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-4.78%
1Y
13.70%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
-9.16%
10Y*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNYA vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
10.91%26.48%10.78%-13.76%-26.51%3.53%41.54%35.95%-26.56%30.99%
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-3.41%37.00%8.56%-18.02%-29.32%-23.67%59.39%37.96%-28.55%81.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CNYA and CXSE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2016

0.75

The correlation between CNYA and CXSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNYA vs. CXSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNYA
CXSE

Technology

31.7%
27.4%

Financial Services

17.6%
6.2%

Industrials

15.4%
12.7%

Basic Materials

11.2%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
24.6%

Healthcare

3.9%
8.6%

Utilities

3.3%
0.2%

Energy

3.1%
0.4%

Communication Services

1.3%
12.1%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.8%

Technology

CNYA
31.7%
CXSE
27.4%

Financial Services

CNYA
17.6%
CXSE
6.2%

Industrials

CNYA
15.4%
CXSE
12.7%

Basic Materials

CNYA
11.2%
CXSE
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

CNYA
6.8%
CXSE
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CNYA
5.2%
CXSE
24.6%

Healthcare

CNYA
3.9%
CXSE
8.6%

Utilities

CNYA
3.3%
CXSE
0.2%

Energy

CNYA
3.1%
CXSE
0.4%

Communication Services

CNYA
1.3%
CXSE
12.1%

Real Estate

CNYA
0.6%
CXSE
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNYA vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNYA
CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYA vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNYACXSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.13

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

0.78

+3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

1.53

+11.29

CNYA vs. CXSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the CXSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYA and CXSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNYA vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYA drawdown since its inception was -49.49%, smaller than the maximum CXSE drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYA and CXSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNYACXSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-70.01%

+20.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-17.70%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.35%

-32.12%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.65%

-64.47%

+19.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.49%

-70.01%

+20.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.14%

-48.33%

+36.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.64%

-27.91%

+7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

9.00%

-6.24%

Volatility

CNYA vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) have volatilities of 7.38% and 7.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNYACXSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

7.23%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

15.57%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

21.68%

-3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

32.36%

-8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.52%

28.73%

-5.21%

CNYA vs. CXSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CXSE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNYA vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison

CNYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than CXSE's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
1.69%1.92%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.06%1.21%3.92%0.97%1.38%0.00%
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.50%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNYA and CXSE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNYA has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to CXSE (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNYA dropped -49.49% vs CXSE's -70.01%.

On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 7.10% vs 6.74% for CNYA. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, CXSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 7.10% return vs 6.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.

CNYA has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.50% for CXSE.

CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CNYA and 0.32% for CXSE.

CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNYA and CXSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer