PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNUA.DE achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than LHKG.DE's -6.38% return.


CNUA.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.29%
YTD
13.12%
6M
15.08%
1Y
40.21%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*

LHKG.DE

1D
-0.30%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
-8.89%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*
2.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CNUA.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
13.12%15.18%24.15%-14.62%-18.77%18.43%30.72%
LHKG.DE
Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist
-6.38%21.50%20.37%-17.49%-7.90%-6.59%-3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CNUA.DE and LHKG.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.65

The correlation between CNUA.DE and LHKG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNUA.DE
CNUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CNUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CNUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

LHKG.DE
LHKG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
LHKG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHKG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHKG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LHKG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHKG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNUA.DELHKG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.05

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.20

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

0.38

+4.60

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the LHKG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNUA.DE and LHKG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNUA.DELHKG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.18

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

-0.09

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.12

+0.23

Drawdowns

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.81%, smaller than the maximum LHKG.DE drawdown of -58.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNUA.DE and LHKG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNUA.DELHKG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.81%

-58.71%

+20.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-17.64%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.63%

-26.41%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.81%

-43.07%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-16.18%

+13.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.12%

-19.83%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.11%

9.15%

-1.04%

Volatility

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) is 4.93%, while Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that CNUA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LHKG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNUA.DELHKG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

8.31%

-3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

14.08%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.65%

19.89%

+7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.09%

24.93%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.24%

22.47%

+3.77%

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNUA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LHKG.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNUA.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Dividend Comparison

CNUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNUA.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LHKG.DE
Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist
1.61%1.50%2.18%0.17%3.78%1.35%2.46%2.58%3.04%2.30%3.38%3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNUA.DE and LHKG.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNUA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.

CNUA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CNUA.DE and 0.65% for LHKG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNUA.DE and LHKG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer