PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CNUA.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
1.86%15.18%24.15%-14.62%-18.77%18.43%30.72%
C024.DE
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist
1.62%14.97%22.87%-17.78%-16.12%3.37%29.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNUA.DE achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than C024.DE's 1.62% return.


CNUA.DE

1D
0.30%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
1.86%
6M
5.10%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*

C024.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
1.62%
6M
3.76%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
5.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNUA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than C024.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNUA.DE
CNUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CNUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CNUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

C024.DE
C024.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
C024.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C024.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
C024.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
C024.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
C024.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNUA.DEC024.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

1.40

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

1.89

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

3.95

-2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.80

10.89

-8.10

CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the C024.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNUA.DE and C024.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNUA.DEC024.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.40

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

-0.03

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.27

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CNUA.DE and C024.DE is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE - Dividend Comparison

CNUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CNUA.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
C024.DE
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist
1.86%1.89%2.19%1.98%1.34%1.23%1.42%1.88%2.49%

Drawdowns

CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.81%, smaller than the maximum C024.DE drawdown of -49.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNUA.DE and C024.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNUA.DEC024.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.81%

-49.68%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-7.57%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.81%

-40.91%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.27%

-17.06%

+5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.41%

-25.00%

+9.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

2.46%

+5.53%

Volatility

CNUA.DE vs. C024.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI China A SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CNUA.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) have volatilities of 4.99% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNUA.DEC024.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

5.02%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.99%

11.08%

+13.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.42%

16.16%

+12.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.13%

22.95%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.43%

24.35%

+2.08%