CNQQ vs. ASHS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - CNQQ tracks the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech while ASHS tracks the CSI 500 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNQQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.

Performance

CNQQ vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CNQQ having a 12.03% return and ASHS slightly higher at 12.55%.

CNQQ

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 7.11%
• YTD: 12.03%
• 6M: 12.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASHS

• 1D: -2.29%
• 1M: -5.51%
• YTD: 12.55%
• 6M: 19.53%
• 1Y: 51.44%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 3.51%
• 10Y*: 3.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQQ vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	12.03%	-5.96%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	12.55%	5.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQQ and ASHS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

CNQQ vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 70
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNQQ vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CNQQ	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.18	+0.14

Drawdowns

CNQQ vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQQ drawdown since its inception was -17.82%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQQ and ASHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNQQ	ASHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.82%	-69.90%	+52.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-35.04%	+33.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-48.56%	+39.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CNQQ	ASHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.06%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.37%	22.68%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.37%	26.47%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.37%	25.58%	-1.21%

CNQQ vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNQQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNQQ vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

CNQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF	0.23%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNQQ and ASHS in my portfolio?

CNQQ and ASHS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CNQQ or ASHS?

On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNQQ or ASHS?

ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNQQ or ASHS?

CNQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.

What is the main difference between CNQQ and ASHS?

CNQQ tracks Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech, while ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNQQ and 0.65% for ASHS.