PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNQ vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNQ vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNQ achieves a 35.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CNQ has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 17.89%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.91% annualized return.


CNQ

1D
-0.31%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
35.04%
6M
38.56%
1Y
38.90%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
26.12%
10Y*
17.89%

SCHD

1D
0.89%
1M
3.21%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.57%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNQ vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
35.04%15.58%-1.31%23.72%42.82%83.55%-19.06%39.72%-29.92%15.97%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.66%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CNQ and SCHD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between CNQ and SCHD has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNQ vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNQ
CNQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNQ vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNQSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

5.70

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

13.97

-7.04

CNQ vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNQ and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNQ vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNQ drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNQ and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNQSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.75%

-33.37%

-47.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

-4.61%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.85%

-16.13%

-19.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.85%

-16.85%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.84%

-33.37%

-44.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.57%

-0.03%

-9.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.51%

-3.31%

-20.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

1.89%

+4.41%

Volatility

CNQ vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that CNQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNQSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

3.05%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.09%

7.53%

+16.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.06%

10.93%

+18.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.86%

14.38%

+18.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.24%

16.72%

+23.52%

Dividends

CNQ vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

CNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than SCHD's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
2.89%5.01%5.02%4.17%6.31%3.78%5.26%3.49%4.56%3.08%2.94%4.21%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNQ and SCHD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNQ has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNQ dropped -80.75% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNQ and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer