CNM vs. ANF
CNM (Core & Main, Inc.) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. CNM operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, CNM returned 23.07%/yr vs 32.43%/yr for ANF. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNM vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNM achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than ANF's -36.82% return.
CNM
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- -12.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANF
- 1D
- 5.55%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- -36.82%
- 6M
- -17.16%
- 1Y
- -4.18%
- 3Y*
- 32.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.89%
- 10Y*
- 17.64%
CNM vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNM Core & Main, Inc. | 0.40% | 2.08% | 25.98% | 109.27% | -36.35% | 51.70% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -36.82% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | -12.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNM and ANF is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
CNM:
$3.34
ANF:
$10.45
CNM:
15.63
ANF:
7.61
CNM:
0.26
ANF:
0.00
CNM:
0.90
ANF:
0.71
CNM:
$7.65B
ANF:
$5.28B
CNM:
$2.06B
ANF:
$2.56B
CNM:
$856.00M
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNM vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
CNM
ANF
CNM vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.05 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.09 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -0.17 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | -0.07 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.14 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
CNM vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNM drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, smaller than the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNM and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.00% | -86.59% | +46.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.88% | -45.65% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.74% | -65.89% | +27.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.10% | -58.66% | +36.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.16% | -42.90% | +25.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.22% | 24.11% | -3.89% |
Volatility
CNM vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) is 9.05%, while Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) has a volatility of 16.48%. This indicates that CNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNM | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 16.48% | -7.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.45% | 38.51% | -15.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.27% | 61.56% | -22.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.67% | 61.01% | -20.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.67% | 60.97% | -20.30% |
Dividends
CNM vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNM nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
CNM Core & Main, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CNM vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core & Main, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNM vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
CNM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported a gross profit of 428.00M and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.1%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CNM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported an operating income of 118.00M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
CNM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core & Main, Inc. reported a net income of 70.00M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNM and ANF have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to CNM (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNM dropped -40.00% vs ANF's -86.59%.
ANF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.07 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNM and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer