PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNGLX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNGLX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNGLX achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CNGLX has underperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 6.05%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.68% annualized return.


CNGLX

1D
0.88%
1M
1.96%
6M
10.09%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
6.05%
ALL TIME*
5.43%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CNGLX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNGLX
Commonwealth Global Fund
10.62%6.46%6.79%12.94%-19.81%13.45%14.71%21.78%-13.16%15.60%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CNGLX and MBXIX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.54

The correlation between CNGLX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNGLX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNGLX
CNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNGLX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNGLXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.88

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

14.92

-9.00

CNGLX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNGLX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNGLX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNGLX drawdown since its inception was -58.14%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNGLX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNGLXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.14%

-31.73%

-26.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-3.85%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.28%

-15.59%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.30%

-15.59%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-31.73%

-2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.68%

+2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-3.95%

-5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

1.04%

+1.68%

Volatility

CNGLX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

Commonwealth Global Fund (CNGLX) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that CNGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNGLXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

1.59%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

4.89%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

6.90%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

11.40%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

13.36%

+2.86%

CNGLX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNGLX has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNGLX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

CNGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CNGLX
Commonwealth Global Fund
3.20%3.54%3.37%0.00%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.00%4.43%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNGLX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNGLX has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNGLX dropped -58.14% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNGLX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer