CNEQ vs. HDV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CNEQ (Alger Concentrated Equity ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. CNEQ is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past year, CNEQ returned 47.74% vs 19.54% for HDV. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CNEQ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.

Performance

CNEQ vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNEQ achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 12.57% return.

CNEQ

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: 19.28%
• 6M: 17.74%
• 1Y: 47.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HDV

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: 12.57%
• 6M: 12.67%
• 1Y: 19.54%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: 9.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNEQ vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	19.28%	33.61%	29.82%
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF	12.57%	11.90%	6.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CNEQ and HDV is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2024	-0.05

The correlation between CNEQ and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CNEQ vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNEQ	HDV
Technology	47.4%	0.2%
Communication Services	16.8%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	14.1%	9.2%
Utilities	6.6%	8.1%
Industrials	6.1%	3.5%
Healthcare	4.3%	22.6%
Financial Services	1.6%	4.7%
Basic Materials	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	24.5%
Energy	-	20.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CNEQ vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNEQ

CNEQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
CNEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CNEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CNEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CNEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CNEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

HDV

HDV Risk / Return Rank: 64
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNEQ vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNEQ	HDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.99	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.92	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	3.79	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.72	10.39	-2.67

CNEQ vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNEQ and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNEQ vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNEQ drawdown since its inception was -27.58%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNEQ and HDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNEQ	HDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.58%	-37.04%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.30%	-5.18%	-14.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-2.65%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-3.08%	-1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.20%	1.89%	+4.31%

Volatility

CNEQ vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Alger Concentrated Equity ETF (CNEQ) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.37%. This indicates that CNEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNEQ	HDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	3.37%	+6.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.72%	7.52%	+11.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.98%	9.87%	+14.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.97%	12.80%	+14.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.97%	15.74%	+11.23%

CNEQ vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNEQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNEQ vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

CNEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than HDV's 2.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNEQ Alger Concentrated Equity ETF	0.44%	0.52%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF	2.94%	3.22%	3.67%	3.82%	3.56%	3.47%	4.07%	3.27%	3.67%	3.27%	3.28%	3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNEQ and HDV in my portfolio?

CNEQ and HDV have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNEQ or HDV?

CNEQ has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to HDV (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNEQ dropped -27.58% vs HDV's -37.04%.

Which ETF is better, CNEQ or HDV?

On 1-year performance, CNEQ leads with 47.74% vs 19.54% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNEQ or HDV?

Over the 1-year period, CNEQ has performed better with a 47.74% return vs 19.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNEQ or HDV?

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CNEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNEQ or HDV?

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.44% for CNEQ.

What is the main difference between CNEQ and HDV?

CNEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Alger and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CNEQ and 0.08% for HDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.