PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDU.TO achieves a 24.66% return, which is significantly higher than VXC.TO's 12.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDU.TO has outperformed VXC.TO with an annualized return of 18.90%, while VXC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.66% annualized return.


CNDU.TO

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.81%
6M
16.57%
YTD
24.66%
1Y
60.78%
3Y*
40.07%
5Y*
23.18%
10Y*
18.90%

VXC.TO

1D
-0.90%
1M
-1.51%
6M
8.02%
YTD
12.52%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
12.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNDU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF
24.66%54.27%34.82%15.07%-17.75%59.19%-5.04%42.32%-19.25%15.77%
VXC.TO
Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF
12.52%16.12%26.06%19.20%-13.02%17.21%14.14%20.47%-3.34%15.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CNDU.TO and VXC.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014

0.67

The correlation between CNDU.TO and VXC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNDU.TO
VXC.TO

Financial Services

40.3%
14.3%

Energy

17.7%
3.4%

Basic Materials

13.6%
2.9%

Technology

8.8%
35.7%

Industrials

7.8%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.3%

Utilities

2.6%
2.4%

Communication Services

2.0%
8.5%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.4%

Healthcare

-

8.2%

Financial Services

CNDU.TO
40.3%
VXC.TO
14.3%

Energy

CNDU.TO
17.7%
VXC.TO
3.4%

Basic Materials

CNDU.TO
13.6%
VXC.TO
2.9%

Technology

CNDU.TO
8.8%
VXC.TO
35.7%

Industrials

CNDU.TO
7.8%
VXC.TO
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CNDU.TO
3.9%
VXC.TO
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

CNDU.TO
3.2%
VXC.TO
4.3%

Utilities

CNDU.TO
2.6%
VXC.TO
2.4%

Communication Services

CNDU.TO
2.0%
VXC.TO
8.5%

Real Estate

CNDU.TO
0.2%
VXC.TO
1.4%

Healthcare

CNDU.TO

-

VXC.TO
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDU.TO
CNDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VXC.TO
VXC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VXC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VXC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNDU.TOVXC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

2.80

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.52

10.95

+6.57

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the VXC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDU.TO and VXC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.04%, which is greater than VXC.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDU.TO and VXC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNDU.TOVXC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.04%

-27.28%

-50.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-8.24%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.52%

-16.76%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-21.61%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.48%

-27.28%

-34.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-3.38%

+2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.20%

-3.86%

-19.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.11%

+1.37%

Volatility

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNDU.TOVXC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

3.66%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.11%

11.02%

+8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.06%

13.17%

+10.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.58%

13.87%

+11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.02%

15.27%

+14.75%

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VXC.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNDU.TO vs. VXC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNDU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXC.TO
Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF
1.26%1.39%1.45%1.69%1.82%1.49%1.46%1.81%1.95%1.68%1.86%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNDU.TO and VXC.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VXC.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VXC.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CNDU.TO.

CNDU.TO is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VXC.TO is Global Equities. CNDU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while VXC.TO tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons ETFs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CNDU.TO and 0.22% for VXC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNDU.TO and VXC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer