PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CNDU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF
4.34%54.27%21.67%
USSL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF
-7.35%13.42%22.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNDU.TO achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than USSL.TO's -7.35% return.


CNDU.TO

1D
4.89%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
4.34%
6M
14.56%
1Y
58.23%
3Y*
32.99%
5Y*
21.85%
10Y*
18.53%

USSL.TO

1D
0.55%
1M
-8.11%
YTD
-7.35%
6M
-5.54%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USSL.TO's 1.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNDU.TO
CNDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

USSL.TO
USSL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNDU.TOUSSL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

0.62

+1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

1.05

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.21

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

0.72

+2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.41

2.76

+10.66

CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNDU.TO and USSL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNDU.TOUSSL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

0.62

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.73

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between CNDU.TO and USSL.TO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CNDU.TO nor USSL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.08%, which is greater than USSL.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDU.TO and USSL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNDU.TOUSSL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.08%

-23.90%

-54.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.72%

-15.29%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.17%

-10.30%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-3.66%

-19.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

4.00%

+0.55%

Volatility

CNDU.TO vs. USSL.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.76% compared to Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) at 4.50%. This indicates that CNDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNDU.TOUSSL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.76%

4.50%

+6.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.82%

9.60%

+10.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.08%

22.38%

+6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.44%

19.79%

+5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.07%

19.79%

+10.28%