VXC.TO vs. XEF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO).
VXC.TO and XEF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VXC.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 30, 2014. XEF.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar DM xNA GR CAD. It was launched on Apr 10, 2013. Both VXC.TO and XEF.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VXC.TO or XEF.TO.
Key characteristics
| VXC.TO | XEF.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.45% | 12.80% |
| 1Y Return | 24.65% | 19.39% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.63% | 4.97% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.57% | 7.75% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.93% | 7.88% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.36 | 1.84 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.18% | 10.40% |
| Max Drawdown | -27.28% | -28.50% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.88% | -0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXC.TO and XEF.TO is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VXC.TO vs. XEF.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VXC.TO achieves a 17.45% return, which is significantly higher than XEF.TO's 12.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VXC.TO has outperformed XEF.TO with an annualized return of 10.93%, while XEF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VXC.TO vs. XEF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VXC.TO and XEF.TO have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VXC.TO vs. XEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VXC.TO vs. XEF.TO - Dividend Comparison
VXC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than XEF.TO's 2.55% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXC.TO Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF | 1.50% | 1.69% | 1.82% | 1.49% | 1.46% | 1.80% | 1.94% | 1.68% | 1.86% | 1.83% | 0.84% | 0.00% |
XEF.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 2.55% | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.42% | 1.93% | 2.72% | 2.76% | 2.10% | 2.42% | 2.42% | 5.21% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
VXC.TO vs. XEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, roughly equal to the maximum XEF.TO drawdown of -28.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXC.TO and XEF.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VXC.TO vs. XEF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada Index ETF (VXC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) have volatilities of 3.95% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.