CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO).
CNDU.TO and SLVU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNDU.TO is a passively managed fund by Horizons ETFs that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX 60 Index. It was launched on Jan 8, 2007. SLVU.TO is a passively managed fund by Horizons ETFs that tracks the performance of the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. It was launched on Jun 29, 2009. Both CNDU.TO and SLVU.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNDU.TO BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF | 4.34% | 54.27% | 34.82% | 15.07% | -17.75% | 59.15% | -4.99% | 42.24% | -19.24% | 15.76% |
SLVU.TO BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF | -24.53% | 349.11% | 20.71% | -16.01% | -10.21% | -34.59% | 55.46% | 16.28% | -26.54% | 1.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNDU.TO achieves a 4.34% return, which is significantly higher than SLVU.TO's -24.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CNDU.TO has outperformed SLVU.TO with an annualized return of 18.53%, while SLVU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.30% annualized return.
CNDU.TO
- 1D
- 4.89%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 4.34%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 58.23%
- 3Y*
- 32.99%
- 5Y*
- 21.85%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
SLVU.TO
- 1D
- 14.89%
- 1M
- -38.47%
- YTD
- -24.53%
- 6M
- 53.78%
- 1Y
- 149.33%
- 3Y*
- 52.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVU.TO's 2.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CNDU.TO
SLVU.TO
CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) and BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNDU.TO | SLVU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 1.31 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 1.94 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.95 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.41 | 5.30 | +8.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNDU.TO | SLVU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.31 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.27 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.16 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | -0.05 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNDU.TO and SLVU.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CNDU.TO nor SLVU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.08%, smaller than the maximum SLVU.TO drawdown of -98.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNDU.TO and SLVU.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNDU.TO | SLVU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.08% | -98.60% | +20.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.72% | -76.62% | +55.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -76.62% | +44.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.51% | -80.27% | +18.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.17% | -89.47% | +81.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -84.27% | +60.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 28.12% | -23.57% |
Volatility
CNDU.TO vs. SLVU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BetaPro S&P/TSX 60 2x Daily Bull ETF (CNDU.TO) is 10.76%, while BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a volatility of 38.33%. This indicates that CNDU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNDU.TO | SLVU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 38.33% | -27.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.82% | 130.40% | -110.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.08% | 114.99% | -85.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 72.06% | -46.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.07% | 64.51% | -34.44% |